From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase: use child_process_clear() to clean
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:21:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqedc218to.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240322103502.GA2045297@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:35:02 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> In the run_am() function, we set up a child_process struct to run
> "git-am", allocating memory for its args and env strvecs. These are
> normally cleaned up when we call run_command(). But if we encounter
> certain errors, we exit the function early and try to clean up ourselves
> by clearing the am.args field. This leaks the "env" strvec.
>
> We should use child_process_clear() instead, which covers both. And more
> importantly, it future proofs us against the struct ever growing more
> allocated fields.
When 21853626 (built-in rebase: call `git am` directly, 2019-01-18)
started using run_command() API to drive "am", there already was
child_process API and child_process_clear() did clear both .args and
.env_array members but we used argv_array_clear() only to clear
am.args, leaking am.env_array.
> These are unlikely errors to happen in practice, so they don't actually
> trigger the leak sanitizer in the tests. But we can add a new test which
> does exercise one of the paths (and fails SANITIZE=leak without this
> patch).
> ...
> Not sure if the test is overkill. It really does nothing useful in a
> non-leak-checking build.
I wonder what are in .env array at this point, though, but that is
mere curiosity and not a problem with this patch.
Thanks. Will queue.
> diff --git a/t/t3438-rebase-broken-files.sh b/t/t3438-rebase-broken-files.sh
> index c614c4f2e4..821f08e5af 100755
> --- a/t/t3438-rebase-broken-files.sh
> +++ b/t/t3438-rebase-broken-files.sh
> @@ -58,4 +58,13 @@ test_expect_success 'unknown key in author-script' '
> check_resolve_fails
> '
>
> +test_expect_success POSIXPERM,SANITY 'unwritable rebased-patches does not leak' '
> + >.git/rebased-patches &&
> + chmod a-w .git/rebased-patches &&
> +
> + git checkout -b side HEAD^ &&
> + test_commit unrelated &&
> + test_must_fail git rebase --apply --onto tmp HEAD^
> +'
> +
> test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-22 10:35 [PATCH] rebase: use child_process_clear() to clean Jeff King
2024-03-22 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-03-22 23:36 ` Jeff King
2024-03-25 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqedc218to.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).