From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t4053: avoid race when killing background processes
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:40:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqedkassng.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1571.git.1691677993195.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:33:13 +0000")
"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> The test 'diff --no-index reads from pipes' starts a couple of
> background processes that write to the pipes that are passed to "diff
> --no-index". If the test passes then we expect these processes to exit
> as all their output will have been read. However if the test fails
> then we want to make sure they do not hang about on the users machine
> and the test remembers they should be killed by calling
>
> test_when_finished "! kill $!"
>
> after each background process is created. Unfortunately there is a
> race where test_when_finished may run before the background process
> exits even when all its output has been read resulting in the kill
> command succeeding which causes the test to fail. Fix this by ignoring
> the exit status of the kill command. If the diff is successful we
> could instead wait for the background process to exit and check their
> status but that feels like it is testing the platform's printf
> implementation rather than git's code.
>
> Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
> t4053: avoid race when killing background processes
>
> Thanks to Peff for reporting this. Junio - this fixes a regression
> introduced in the current cycle. It is fairly minor though so I'm not
> sure if you want to pick it up now or wait until 2.42.0 is out.
This did not cut -rc1 that was scheduled for yesterday, but a fix
for a new test added during the cycle is a very welcome addition.
While I can see that "kill" in the when-finished handler may or may
not find the backgrounded process by the time it is run, and
ignoring its exit status (hence keeping test_when_finished happy)
would be a reasonable thing to do. I can understand if this patch
is to fix a different symptom, namely, when-finished handler
sometimes fails and makes the test fail.
But I am not sure how this causes the test to "hang", which
presumably is a symptom that somebody is trying to read from
a pipe that nobody is making progress to write into? We will
send a signal either way to the writers, and the only difference is
that we ignore the exit code.
Granted, when-finished handlers are concatenated with "&&-", and one
"kill"s failure will cause the other "kill" not to run, so we may
send a signal to only one but not to the other, but that should all
happen after "diff --no-index" returns, so it still does not explain
the "hang".
Puzzled...
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1571%2Fphillipwood%2Fdiff-no-index-pipes-fixes-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1571/phillipwood/diff-no-index-pipes-fixes-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1571
>
> t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> index a28b9ff2434..1fb7d334620 100755
> --- a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> +++ b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> @@ -248,11 +248,11 @@ test_expect_success PIPE,SYMLINKS 'diff --no-index reads from pipes' '
> {
> (test_write_lines a b c >old) &
> } &&
> - test_when_finished "! kill $!" &&
> + test_when_finished "kill $! || :" &&
> {
> (test_write_lines a x c >new) &
> } &&
> - test_when_finished "! kill $!" &&
> + test_when_finished "kill $! || :" &&
>
> cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> diff --git a/old b/new-link
>
> base-commit: a82fb66fed250e16d3010c75404503bea3f0ab61
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 14:33 [PATCH] t4053: avoid race when killing background processes Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2023-08-10 17:40 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-08-11 9:56 ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-11 14:44 ` Jeff King
2023-08-11 15:47 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqedkassng.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).