git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t4053: avoid race when killing background processes
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:40:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqedkassng.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1571.git.1691677993195.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:33:13 +0000")

"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> The test 'diff --no-index reads from pipes' starts a couple of
> background processes that write to the pipes that are passed to "diff
> --no-index". If the test passes then we expect these processes to exit
> as all their output will have been read. However if the test fails
> then we want to make sure they do not hang about on the users machine
> and the test remembers they should be killed by calling
>
>       test_when_finished  "! kill $!"
>
> after each background process is created. Unfortunately there is a
> race where test_when_finished may run before the background process
> exits even when all its output has been read resulting in the kill
> command succeeding which causes the test to fail. Fix this by ignoring
> the exit status of the kill command. If the diff is successful we
> could instead wait for the background process to exit and check their
> status but that feels like it is testing the platform's printf
> implementation rather than git's code.
>
> Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
>     t4053: avoid race when killing background processes
>     
>     Thanks to Peff for reporting this. Junio - this fixes a regression
>     introduced in the current cycle. It is fairly minor though so I'm not
>     sure if you want to pick it up now or wait until 2.42.0 is out.

This did not cut -rc1 that was scheduled for yesterday, but a fix
for a new test added during the cycle is a very welcome addition.

While I can see that "kill" in the when-finished handler may or may
not find the backgrounded process by the time it is run, and
ignoring its exit status (hence keeping test_when_finished happy)
would be a reasonable thing to do.  I can understand if this patch
is to fix a different symptom, namely, when-finished handler
sometimes fails and makes the test fail.

But I am not sure how this causes the test to "hang", which
presumably is a symptom that somebody is trying to read from
a pipe that nobody is making progress to write into?  We will
send a signal either way to the writers, and the only difference is
that we ignore the exit code.

Granted, when-finished handlers are concatenated with "&&-", and one
"kill"s failure will cause the other "kill" not to run, so we may
send a signal to only one but not to the other, but that should all
happen after "diff --no-index" returns, so it still does not explain
the "hang".

Puzzled...

> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1571%2Fphillipwood%2Fdiff-no-index-pipes-fixes-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1571/phillipwood/diff-no-index-pipes-fixes-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1571
>
>  t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> index a28b9ff2434..1fb7d334620 100755
> --- a/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> +++ b/t/t4053-diff-no-index.sh
> @@ -248,11 +248,11 @@ test_expect_success PIPE,SYMLINKS 'diff --no-index reads from pipes' '
>  	{
>  		(test_write_lines a b c >old) &
>  	} &&
> -	test_when_finished "! kill $!" &&
> +	test_when_finished "kill $! || :" &&
>  	{
>  		(test_write_lines a x c >new) &
>  	} &&
> -	test_when_finished "! kill $!" &&
> +	test_when_finished "kill $! || :" &&
>  
>  	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
>  	diff --git a/old b/new-link
>
> base-commit: a82fb66fed250e16d3010c75404503bea3f0ab61

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10 14:33 [PATCH] t4053: avoid race when killing background processes Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2023-08-10 17:40 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-08-11  9:56   ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-11 14:44     ` Jeff King
2023-08-11 15:47     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqedkassng.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).