From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Better suggestions when git-am(1) fails
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 08:22:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqedpxq4if.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAlPtxZ/0Z28r5tF@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2023 22:17:11 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 09:15:53PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
>> I had the following error already a few times, when some contributors,
>> for some reason unknown to me, remove the leading path components from
>> the patch.
>
> The reason is probably that they have set diff.noprefix in their config,
> and git-format-patch respects that. Which is arguably a bug.
FWIW, I've always considered it a feature to help projects that
prefer their patches in -p0 form. Of course, Git optimized itself
for the usecase we consider the optimum, i.e. using a/ and b/ prefix
on the diff generation side, while stripping them with -p1 on the
applying side.
I wonder apply.plevel or am.plevel would be a good way to help them
further?
I am not sure making format-patch _ignore_ diff.src/dst_prefix is a
good approach. If we were wiser, we may not have introduced the
diff.noprefix option, made sure diff.src/dstprefix to be always a
single level, and kept -p<n> on the application side as an escape
hatch only to deal with non-Git generated patches. The opportunity
to simplify the world that way however we missed 15 years ago X-<.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 20:15 Better suggestions when git-am(1) fails Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 3:17 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:06 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] diff: factor out src/dst prefix setup Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:50 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 6:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] t4013: add tests for diff prefix options Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] diff: add --default-prefix option Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:51 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 16:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:44 ` Jeff King
2023-03-10 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 16:43 ` Jeff King
2023-03-13 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 19:54 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:53 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:49 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 6:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] format-patch: add format.noprefix option Jeff King
2023-03-09 17:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:51 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 10:58 ` Better suggestions when git-am(1) fails Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-09 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-10 9:54 ` Jeff King
2023-03-09 16:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-10 9:39 ` Jeff King
2023-03-10 16:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-13 16:37 ` Jeff King
2023-03-13 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqedpxq4if.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).