From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Calvin Wan" <calvinwan@google.com>,
"Emily Shaffer" <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
"Glen Choo" <chooglen@google.com>,
"Victoria Dye" <vdye@github.com>,
"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:36:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqedvclqxm.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a84cf971a753e294555ca8f2b7eaa4c75a8fa491.1665567312.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:35:05 +0000")
"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> Use move_to_original_branch() when reattaching HEAD after a fast-forward
> rather than open coding a copy of that code. move_to_original_branch()
> does not call reset_head() if head_name is NULL but there should be no
> user visible changes even though we currently call reset_head() in that
> case.
move_to_original_branch() uses both .head_msg and .branch_msg and
uses different messages for them, but the original code below only
feeds .head_msg while .branch_msg leaves NULL, which leads
reset.c::update_refs() to use the same message as .head_msg when it
wants to use .branch_msg (i.e. the message recorded in the reflog of
the branch).
Doesn't this difference result in a different behaviour?
> The reason for this is that the reset_head() call does not add a
> message to the reflog because we're not changing the commit that HEAD
> points to and so lock_ref_for_update() elides the update. When head_name
> is not NULL then reset_head() behaves like "git symbolic-ref" and so the
> reflog is updated.
> Note that the removal of "strbuf_release(&msg)" is safe as there is an
The patch is removing strbuf_reset(), not _release(), here, though.
We have released already so there is no point to reset it again, so
the removal is still safe.
> identical call just above this hunk which can be seen by viewing the
> diff with -U6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
> builtin/rebase.c | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index a2ca66b54be..51accb4fd61 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -1808,19 +1808,10 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> * If the onto is a proper descendant of the tip of the branch, then
> * we just fast-forwarded.
> */
> - strbuf_reset(&msg);
> if (oideq(&branch_base, &options.orig_head->object.oid)) {
> printf(_("Fast-forwarded %s to %s.\n"),
> branch_name, options.onto_name);
> - strbuf_addf(&msg, "rebase finished: %s onto %s",
> - options.head_name ? options.head_name : "detached HEAD",
> - oid_to_hex(&options.onto->object.oid));
> - memset(&ropts, 0, sizeof(ropts));
> - ropts.branch = options.head_name;
> - ropts.flags = RESET_HEAD_REFS_ONLY;
> - ropts.head_msg = msg.buf;
> - reset_head(the_repository, &ropts);
> - strbuf_release(&msg);
> + move_to_original_branch(&options);
> ret = finish_rebase(&options);
> goto cleanup;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 11:10 [PATCH 0/7] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-07 13:35 ` Christian Couder
2022-04-17 1:56 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-07 13:49 ` Christian Couder
2022-04-15 14:00 ` Phillip Wood
2022-04-17 1:57 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17 1:58 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-07 13:59 ` Christian Couder
2022-04-15 14:03 ` Phillip Wood
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17 2:03 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17 2:07 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-21 11:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-17 2:07 ` Elijah Newren
2022-04-04 15:34 ` Review Request (was Re: [PATCH 0/7] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend) Phillip Wood
2022-04-17 2:13 ` Elijah Newren
2022-04-18 18:56 ` Phillip Wood
2022-04-07 14:15 ` [PATCH 0/7] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Christian Couder
2022-04-17 2:09 ` Elijah Newren
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 10:10 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-20 18:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] t3406: rework rebase reflog tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 20:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 10:22 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-04-20 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-04-20 10:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] rebase --apply: remove duplicated code Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 20:36 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-10-13 18:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-20 9:50 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] t3406: rework rebase reflog tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-12 20:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] rebase: make reflog messages independent of the backend Junio C Hamano
2022-10-13 8:44 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-13 15:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] t3406: rework rebase reflog tests Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] rebase --apply: improve fast-forward reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-25 10:08 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-25 16:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-26 15:17 ` Phillip Wood
2022-10-26 16:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] rebase --abort: improve reflog message Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-21 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] rebase: cleanup action handling Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2022-10-21 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqedvclqxm.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=calvinwan@google.com \
--cc=chooglen@google.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=vdye@github.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).