git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@gmail.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git cherry-pick with --no-verify option
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:13:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqee34m8kz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAJYFCiPw6VPPKpiC0f1iwdYf0LCFCbfrpNSHFs1qbwtGXX6pUA@mail.gmail.com

Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@gmail.com> writes:

> Is there any version of Git that supports the cherry-pick command with
> "--no-verify"?
>
> It is supported in "git commit" command but not in "git cherry-pick"
> command, and I always have to move .git/hooks/pre-commit away to work
> around this in case of "git cherry-pick".

Does "git cherry-pick" even trigger pre-commit hook in the first
place?  In my quick tests, it does not seem to.

 $ git init test
 $ cd test
 $ printf "%s\n" '#!/bin/sh' 'echo >&2 no' 'exit 1' >.git/hooks/pre-commit
 $ chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit
 $ git commit --allow-empty -m initial
 no

Up to this point, I set up a pre-commit that stops me
unconditionally and made sure it is working.

 $ git commit --no-verify --allow-empty -m initial
 [master (root-commit) 5d967c2] initial
 $ I=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
 $ echo "foo" >file
 $ git add file
 $ git commit --no-verify -m 'add file'
 [master 93a33c4] add file
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
  create mode 100644 file

Then I built two commits

 $ git checkout --detach $I
 HEAD is now at 5d967c2 initial

And rewound to the initial commit so that the second one can be
cherry-picked on top of it.

 $ git cherry-pick master
 [detached HEAD 699c604] add file
  Date: Mon Mar 14 15:58:38 2022 -0700
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
  create mode 100644 file

And that is understandable, as "cherry-pick" is more about replaying
what was committed in the past, with bugs and crufts preserved, than
committing a new-and-improved version out of an existing commit.

Perhaps in a case where a conflict stops the command there is
something?  Let's see.  Continuing from the above transcript:

 $ git cherry-pick master
 HEAD detached from 5d967c2
 You are currently cherry-picking commit 93a33c4.
   (all conflicts fixed: run "git cherry-pick --continue")
   (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
   (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

 nothing to commit, working tree clean
 The previous cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution.
 If you wish to commit it anyway, use:

     git commit --allow-empty

 Otherwise, please use 'git cherry-pick --skip'
 $ edit file
 $ git commit --allow-empty -a
 no

Of course, "git commit" to conclude a conflicted cherry-pick,
possibly with intervening conflict resolutin by editing working tree
files, would by default trigger pre-commit hook, and it of course
takes --no-verify as expected.

 $ git commit --allow-empty -a --no-verify --no-edit
 [detached HEAD 5858d22] add file
  Date: Mon Mar 14 15:58:38 2022 -0700

Ahh, I think the user is fooled by a bad advice in the message.
(all conflicts fixed: run "git cherry-pick --continue") is wrong and
misleading advice added by those who did not think things through.

After fixing all conflicts, run "git commit" to record it and then
you run "git cherry-pick --continue" if there are more steps to
cherry-pick (i.e. "git cherry-pick A..B").  "git commit" takes not
just "--no-verify" but other options like "--reset-author" to let
you take over authorship if the conflict resolution (actually,
adjusting the original commit to the different context it is being
cherry-picked to) is so involved that a change of authorship is
warranted.  "cherry-pick --continue" does not have all the necessary
flexibility and conceptually it is a separte operation (i.e. "please
continue the stopped sequence" is what it means) from concluding the
current step in the sequence.



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-14  5:41 git cherry-pick with --no-verify option Yubin Ruan
2022-03-14 23:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-03-15  2:29   ` Yubin Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqee34m8kz.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ablacktshirt@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).