From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@gmail.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git cherry-pick with --no-verify option
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 23:13:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqee34m8kz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAJYFCiPw6VPPKpiC0f1iwdYf0LCFCbfrpNSHFs1qbwtGXX6pUA@mail.gmail.com
Yubin Ruan <ablacktshirt@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there any version of Git that supports the cherry-pick command with
> "--no-verify"?
>
> It is supported in "git commit" command but not in "git cherry-pick"
> command, and I always have to move .git/hooks/pre-commit away to work
> around this in case of "git cherry-pick".
Does "git cherry-pick" even trigger pre-commit hook in the first
place? In my quick tests, it does not seem to.
$ git init test
$ cd test
$ printf "%s\n" '#!/bin/sh' 'echo >&2 no' 'exit 1' >.git/hooks/pre-commit
$ chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit
$ git commit --allow-empty -m initial
no
Up to this point, I set up a pre-commit that stops me
unconditionally and made sure it is working.
$ git commit --no-verify --allow-empty -m initial
[master (root-commit) 5d967c2] initial
$ I=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
$ echo "foo" >file
$ git add file
$ git commit --no-verify -m 'add file'
[master 93a33c4] add file
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 file
Then I built two commits
$ git checkout --detach $I
HEAD is now at 5d967c2 initial
And rewound to the initial commit so that the second one can be
cherry-picked on top of it.
$ git cherry-pick master
[detached HEAD 699c604] add file
Date: Mon Mar 14 15:58:38 2022 -0700
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 file
And that is understandable, as "cherry-pick" is more about replaying
what was committed in the past, with bugs and crufts preserved, than
committing a new-and-improved version out of an existing commit.
Perhaps in a case where a conflict stops the command there is
something? Let's see. Continuing from the above transcript:
$ git cherry-pick master
HEAD detached from 5d967c2
You are currently cherry-picking commit 93a33c4.
(all conflicts fixed: run "git cherry-pick --continue")
(use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
(use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
The previous cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution.
If you wish to commit it anyway, use:
git commit --allow-empty
Otherwise, please use 'git cherry-pick --skip'
$ edit file
$ git commit --allow-empty -a
no
Of course, "git commit" to conclude a conflicted cherry-pick,
possibly with intervening conflict resolutin by editing working tree
files, would by default trigger pre-commit hook, and it of course
takes --no-verify as expected.
$ git commit --allow-empty -a --no-verify --no-edit
[detached HEAD 5858d22] add file
Date: Mon Mar 14 15:58:38 2022 -0700
Ahh, I think the user is fooled by a bad advice in the message.
(all conflicts fixed: run "git cherry-pick --continue") is wrong and
misleading advice added by those who did not think things through.
After fixing all conflicts, run "git commit" to record it and then
you run "git cherry-pick --continue" if there are more steps to
cherry-pick (i.e. "git cherry-pick A..B"). "git commit" takes not
just "--no-verify" but other options like "--reset-author" to let
you take over authorship if the conflict resolution (actually,
adjusting the original commit to the different context it is being
cherry-picked to) is so involved that a change of authorship is
warranted. "cherry-pick --continue" does not have all the necessary
flexibility and conceptually it is a separte operation (i.e. "please
continue the stopped sequence" is what it means) from concluding the
current step in the sequence.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 5:41 git cherry-pick with --no-verify option Yubin Ruan
2022-03-14 23:13 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-03-15 2:29 ` Yubin Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqee34m8kz.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ablacktshirt@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).