git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:29:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqee7gbj1n.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAN0heSpLy8c6WM1UpyEXJLfmnX=5B0eFhJwH3wqSZN15HAJGeg@mail.gmail.com

Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 07:30, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are certain C99 features that might be nice to use in our code
>> base, but we've hesitated to do so in order to avoid breaking
>> compatibility with older compilers. But we don't actually know if
>> people are even using pre-C99 compilers these days.
>
>> is a long-enough time, so let's try it agin.
>
> s/agin/again/
>
>>  void show_object_with_name(FILE *out, struct object *obj, const char *name)
>>  {
>> -       const char *p;
>> -
>>         fprintf(out, "%s ", oid_to_hex(&obj->oid));
>> -       for (p = name; *p && *p != '\n'; p++)
>> +       for (const char *p = name; *p && *p != '\n'; p++)
>>                 fputc(*p, out);
>>         fputc('\n', out);
>>  }
>
> This seems like a stable-enough function for this experiment.

Yup, the callers and the implementation are from several years ago,
if I am not mistaken.

> Similar to 765dc16888 ("git-compat-util: always enable variadic macros",
> 2021-01-28), maybe we should add something like
>
>   /*
>    * This "for (const char *p = ..." is made as a first step towards
>    * making use of such declarations elsewhere in our codebase.  If
>    * it causes compilation problems on your platform, please report
>    * it to the Git mailing list at git@vger.kernel.org.
>    */
>
> to reduce the chance of someone patching it up locally thinking that
> it's just a one-off.

Probably.  It would help people to refrain from copying and pasting
this and making it harder to back out, too.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-16  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-13 12:28 [PATCH] MyFirstContribution.txt: fix undeclared variable i in sample code Saksham Mittal
2021-11-13 13:05 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2021-11-13 13:08   ` Saksham Mittal
2021-11-14  6:41     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-14 14:28       ` Is 'for (int i = [...]' bad for C STD compliance reasons? (was: [PATCH] MyFirstContribution.txt: fix undeclared variable i in sample code) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-14 18:03         ` Is 'for (int i = [...]' bad for C STD compliance reasons? Junio C Hamano
2021-11-14 18:25           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-14 18:57             ` brian m. carlson
2021-11-14 19:33               ` Carlo Arenas
2021-11-14 19:01             ` Carlo Arenas
2021-11-15  6:27           ` [PATCH] revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop Junio C Hamano
2021-11-15  7:44             ` Martin Ågren
2021-11-16  8:29               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-11-15 22:26             ` brian m. carlson
2021-11-17 11:03             ` Phillip Wood
2021-11-17 12:39               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-11-17 22:30               ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-11-18  7:09               ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-07 11:10                 ` Phillip Wood
2021-12-07 20:37                   ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-08 12:17                 ` Removing -Wdeclaration-after-statement (was: [PATCH] revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for() loop) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-08 17:05                   ` Removing -Wdeclaration-after-statement Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqee7gbj1n.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).