From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5258DC433FE for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270702389F for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726063AbgLGSjv (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:39:51 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59483 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725804AbgLGSju (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:39:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695B4AD72E; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:39:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Kvj4DZwPdlT+K6cy6G3glrAMtWw=; b=kydPc1 ckM4cA5k1/VqTWahuxdRWJakUCTBX4DctKL6qU2mbmcYZLN+W+FCK4t8iCu4ZVdC jovWBVJHs3yk1+BArkxFrPZ0grpGJQfEYFK8W2q1Heo/NlYi5yfapnx0RJw010g2 tKMbV20hPcSj0HrQcyHYoBVT/Fuuw4ktmaK+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=POnQkjU/+ACieX9DCBRMnMRJAZ4raLuZ ijoSoD3f9LgbKJTTWrrAPDA/kaG7aRKkvy72x68y7k505lGJTc6g6VjM1KuuD2tA nwEi1sanlCAUjuysbz+Lh1owvIftaqLQSDfMqCdqf3Mhf+/X3FmsLSL68/ei3Iz8 ZL3xwoPHhkQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F04BAD72D; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:39:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3421AD72A; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:39:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" , Sangeeta Jain Cc: Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5310: stop expecting the default branch name `master` References: Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:39:06 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:35:48 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7D5CC278-38BB-11EB-857E-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" > writes: > >> This one goes on top of tb/pack-bitmap, and requires an update of >> js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch (it no longer needs to >> hard-code GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME in t5310). > > As the targetted topic is not in 'next' and marked with "Needs a bit > of reshuffling?", I'd appreciate this patch to be also forwarded so > that I do not have to worry about it myself. > > The same goes for > which currently sits at the tip of tb/pack-bitmap. Oops--wrong branch info. I meant the patch in that is targetted for the "git diff" stuff. > > Thanks, both.