From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BEDC43603 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 22:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE9820637 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 22:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Y+7/ScPs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726930AbfLIWGR (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:06:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52185 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726787AbfLIWGR (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:06:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DD7229AC; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:06:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HOeauO8p0oQj+B334+IciKB3KWE=; b=Y+7/Sc PsCPFvmWlcixa+aDOkW7qP6irk6Ik9O6K88cSNpEMdj3i+1c1F3GDuHF59n2R/e0 YpVXHj69OGR95UpLFTlpWsqAvTMjPvqO6AVI742JLOvffG1jZI7PO5VpojmrGj+P Oz3uT13TbJgUSbLfL2sD7V3Iga2WjKMvfHNZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=FlELWFIQM1L5N2TLimQnkTKkcpYnWrhq n+aBrz/6NPQ7rO1FlceR+FtqStA/cUvYxdwPMl2pCTpE/fZQei+ZvWIhyKTodRli RIIi64yUxCx87RCvFjhK8bhHzwmmC+MQb5K1i6XQ7HycgXL/9LaUVzDL/80M50aG Da40P2MGoqI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FAE229AB; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:06:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADC0B229AA; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 17:06:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Ben Keene via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ben Keene , Luke Diamand Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] git-p4: Usability enhancements References: Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:06:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Ben Keene via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:16:46 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1E032B8C-1AD0-11EA-B870-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Ben Keene via GitGitGadget" writes: > Some user interaction with git-p4 is not as user-friendly as the rest of the > Git ecosystem. Here are three areas that can be improved on: Sorry, but I am not a git-p4 person and I barely speak passable Python, so I am not a great reviewer for the initial round of any patch in this area. IOW it is not all that useful to Cc me, as opposed to somebody who have been working with git-p4 code longer and more deeply. $ git shortlog --no-merges --since=2.years git-p4.py may be a good way to choose whom we would want to ask for an initial round of review (and Luke, who I consider the de-facto git-p4 person,. is Cc'ed). Thanks.