From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98404C432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8A82071A for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="M2rRFdMf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725851AbfKYGaN (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 01:30:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55152 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725535AbfKYGaN (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 01:30:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838BD34082; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 01:30:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZdfF7j1J+nLQkfHGSEIHuD16iac=; b=M2rRFd Mfy9t0jzRsoDrI5RHTwZW3q5xe9vtLTMAO7O22J1CQdkBgjD3fV8wVU30B+rfkAZ T84Hg3rRlqr0r9LPOiXZ/TywKzjakl9CxgVZ+NTIqp2ALlYRLZanGvZSW1SJZt67 /V4cdkmBbbJqveXp3FwK/t9l8LvEkLsHsDDgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kU+mm3yKQRYHpG2cQesxFOpo20Ek3JUQ 0Umep5+5xC2H1zhyS3uDMvqR9C94ccHDbe61Ove3CSi5B3Edowyx6IyQ9UmUFqxh G2+xpxFeQ2mibsfCF62kMBH7wXqB94icwIH3n8YAdxVQSDz/lG6b1HmLwnmwySHw /e8SvC5uwnI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594B034081; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 01:30:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F13A34080; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 01:30:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: christian.couder@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, chriscool@tuxfamily.org, ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Rewrite packfile reuse code References: <20191115141541.11149-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20191115180319.113991-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:30:07 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20191115180319.113991-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:03:19 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 06F2DF2A-0F4D-11EA-BD9D-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: >> It could be a good idea if Peff could answer some of the comments made >> by Jonathan Tan about patch 9/9. >> >> I have put Peff as the author of all the commits. > > Thanks. I think the series looks mostly good except for the questions I > raised in patch 9/9, so I'll wait for Peff to respond too. Hmph, the round before this one has been in 'next' for quite a while, so should I eject it before waiting for Peff to respond before queuing this one? Thanks.