From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66F01FD99 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932669AbcHNU7E (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:59:04 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:62053 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbcHNU7C (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:59:02 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FA133479; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:59:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iDSuhuCs271edhIj95mLD84zQPU=; b=C9+OXi wGCXgYzm8e82jDjokLUL1B2JCfC09XqBEXiynCr1HoeW8fLY30TfiCc1pjjRRZ+O 9sSxk8/aI/GK/RSE5GdjzJJfD+7skOTrxqXQ+XFFqRMoF2c393Z31j+qTp/bF9z1 a+DXO4Jn5cWDwYyXs/6Xml3ghg/zVFEO5XWis= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OMk7i5qtX7+R+6LBVQbrCAc6sU+xQ9HX HEPofGXopzxE4FOt4rS0n+HkYYve4YbI18sR0bUZDyiyTcPXm7NhDoPl577mx3PN 4LVIvUyvwa22/a+r7PgeopIxXodHpOBSb+6gI3sraLjomSqYB0Paq8xG6A6nZCQl sEt6ad847mA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C51433474; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:59:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC76C33473; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:58:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Christian Couder Cc: git , Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen , Nicola Paolucci , Jeff King , Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= , Eric Wong , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , Stefan Beller , Michael Haggerty , Ramsay Jones , remi galan-alfonso , Johannes Sixt , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= , Josh Triplett , Lars Schneider Subject: Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 18 References: Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:58:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Christian Couder's message of "Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:15:00 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC6B3986-6261-11E6-AF51-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Christian Couder writes: > You can also reply to this email. I am not sure that is to be recommended, as that ends up going to the list, but anyway, these - Michael's "finding better -/+ assignment in diff using indent heuristic" - Philip Oakley's updates to revision range notation documentation - Kevin Willford's rather clever optimization on internal patch-id computation that is done to exclude already-applied commit while rebasing are interesting/noteworthy topics that may want to be covered in the discussion/review section.