From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733D52BD03 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 16:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759509000; cv=none; b=fLbUZ0nvaKJk1Cn3jNNbtDkY/4jHSbu18O0r/ArPCwgbhZeUFr4laYEFr2o9aApVE7v2/VyTT17XpHy3OAwyqrv3cSupxjNuv+BmnJbrZUdEgFaKWwXrq7ozu3Ugi2For1ptS3CES6A6hgOIbTVwI6lkNJrbVvn5m2du5ugGvOk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759509000; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4gjSTadApCT0SeLE5rADRDZTvXlcFM58tOcv9hadejo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=j2hS9CYbkGhOmvtzjuYMmKVxede2nGWIHq7WLIPAC4/BiCyjgGqjNGcy1yTJxHJ3bc9Gsf6H2yxCz72TPfEkUOTgkOh7qcZitrSc2FORv4hxZ4s+4apJ7LHsjZiYzKnKjECt0hB/EBxx+gnqu1aG5GELxY2Ys9y8G67NVifTTdg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=c6yr7vIY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=K2UJtORt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.154 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="c6yr7vIY"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="K2UJtORt" Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA561400192; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 12:29:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:29:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1759508997; x=1759595397; bh=oQ8h+bBIKW qWw5+GJEorsFer2+rkx6QtCxXhh6YAD8w=; b=c6yr7vIYwlhpqXPIQAw8Jghitm uLvpSUlweq3fWqG7Q4rbuAU39NCbZjl+5GNZPe1VseF4MFsglNVH6U+wItrGCAxo iCL6esyvxugUf3KwELfcHWApl/8U3NLflphQAFkYRbLdvo/uznXSaHZzBZ2BHTti PbcExtCBWJamtH2W+w4a8bl+nAF7ReVB0cmsYtnS4R8HeQLojfo0lJzFwFE3vUth s/vd+CBIad1yQBlZHO3Cx7YmDVLgpSInNCy689Idx6WPyHSnCe8EOSSi/GHrUPG1 4xHqyX+M8ncRswZmK7zMXf37DpNbTo7YreECVSI/qEnBqF+pS7Czc0RwF47g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1759508997; x=1759595397; bh=oQ8h+bBIKWqWw5+GJEorsFer2+rkx6QtCxX hh6YAD8w=; b=K2UJtORt52eDNbaZvu6gIZwwvoFBMPjPgm9ExL+G1aYnes6R1Dm l0Y6s1rpVpEol0EfDO1Yr4VuJ7/Nl+wH1+0TnAAGEw+NGXg0QSqGPRjq6Gzp7Ydv z8/qV07YGOqnTuxa68tXHHyZCHj5Nbu3loTGy+P9xiKtd9u+igiHVp79Z4WPSp1/ +d/SU7DVRyF0goMCtUh0MIjoUbznIae2blpyekpKQOJ76ATBppEV7bKpojnOBXZG Naun2EGNlXlApEJz66rNH8SZRMCMZk0Q3xrYy6ERGrR4Yb60JhbfVh6w+Lzt3fmk n1BLkcBBWVuaiHZyGQAVD7CUbCu8Vgl9Stg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdekleefkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucev ucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieeg ieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgih htshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgepshhm thhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghffhesphgvfhhfrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepjh hnrdgrvhhilhgrsehfrhgvvgdrfhhrpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghr nhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegtohguvgeskhhhrghughhssggrkhhkrdhnrghmvg dprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 3 Oct 2025 12:29:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= Avila , git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a nested list item In-Reply-To: <20251003034134.GA625140@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 2 Oct 2025 23:41:34 -0400") References: <20250927195032.37223-1-jn.avila@free.fr> <20251003031113.GA6381@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20251003034134.GA625140@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 09:29:55 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jeff King writes: > I think to appease both systems we need to put the inner bulleted list > inside a block. I think that is OK in this case because there is no > inner block marker to worry about. So: > > diff --git a/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc b/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc > index 49a7598ca5..aaea8c107f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc > +++ b/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc > @@ -55,8 +55,9 @@ For historical reasons, this extension is respected regardless of the > refStorage::: > Specify the ref storage format to use. The acceptable values are: > + > +-- > include::../ref-storage-format.adoc[] > - > +-- > + > Note that this setting should only be set by linkgit:git-init[1] or > linkgit:git-clone[1]. Trying to change it after initialization will not > > on top of your patch seems to do the right thing (no change in asciidoc, > and eliminating the regression from your patch). It's a little gross > because we are reaching across the include to realize that > ref-storage-format.adoc contains a list that needs to go into its own > block. I wonder if asciidoc implicitly opens a new block for an include > but asciidoctor doesn't. But at any rate, this is the only way I could > come up with for both to render correctly. Sounds good. Thanks.