From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, christian.couder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:08:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfrjk61bb.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq34fk7hb7.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:37:48 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> As this topic is designing essentially a new and machine parseable
> format, we could even unify all three formats into one. For example,
> the format could be like this:
>
> <oid> NUL [<attr>=<value> NUL]...
>
> where
(0) "rev-list" that gives only a sequence of "<oid>" for commit-ish,
as well as "rev-list --boundary", would fall out as a natural
consequence. Bog-standard "list of commits" would see a
sequence of "<oid> NUL", while a boundary object would see
"<oid> NUL boundary=yes NUL".
> (1) A record ends when a new record begins.
>
> (2) The beginning of a new record is signaled by <oid> that is all
> hexadecimal and does not have any '=' in it.
>
> (3) The traditional "rev-list --objects" output that gives path in
> addition to the object name uses "path" as the <attr> name,
> i.e. such a record looks like "<oid> NUL path=<path> NUL".
>
> (4) The traditional "rev-list --missing" output loses the leading
> "?"; it is replaced by "missing" as the <attr> name, i.e. such
> a record may look like "<oid> NUL missing=yes NUL..." together
> with other "<token>=<value> NUL" pairs appended as needed at
> the end.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 19:28 [PATCH 0/4] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-12 21:39 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-12 21:39 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-12 7:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 21:41 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 19:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 20:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 21:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-03-11 23:24 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-11 23:19 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-11 23:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-12 7:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 21:45 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-10 22:38 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-03-11 22:59 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-11 23:57 ` Jeff King
2025-03-12 7:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 15:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-13 7:46 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-12 22:09 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 5:33 ` Jeff King
2025-03-13 16:41 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-14 2:49 ` Jeff King
2025-03-14 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 18:59 ` Jeff King
2025-03-14 19:53 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-14 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-19 15:58 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] revision: support NUL-delimited --stdin mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 12:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-13 14:44 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 0:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 12:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-13 14:51 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] revision: support NUL-delimited --stdin mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 12:35 ` Christian Couder
2025-03-19 16:02 ` Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option Justin Tobler
2025-03-13 23:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] rev-list: introduce NUL-delimited output mode Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] rev-list: inline `show_object_with_name()` in `show_object()` Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] rev-list: refactor early option parsing Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] rev-list: support delimiting objects with NUL bytes Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --boundary option Justin Tobler
2025-03-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] rev-list: support NUL-delimited --missing option Justin Tobler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqfrjk61bb.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).