From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35C71FCFD3 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741093540; cv=none; b=ejvvH23TxSLPrje2EkXRtGiesouh4fTsQIxroJRGkBbTWPPk6wh7sIu+xIUaWQVb7sF5wF+eSALr3GSYTu/Q2EI4tByJqcw/QNWyIVov5DChKQrPKs0IBh8K0KZkYl5qTv9dpnWv55qek2kVT6zaOFS0CQYxU0noUz3u7gkVa+I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741093540; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KmOyVHl7cxWtDk29P6hboKJSxX85udsAeheEFTcUi0M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uB7DZDN7zY3vfAwWkNdQ0kHKygRJIrXebRowei86WY+bYX4BBagJcaw80gV/tPy9mcCm7fbA6vUV7G+Qp+f3yPyEYLWdZKnxWzDSFFRPc1KNWxVeQ0MYkYYYmog2MlY6CaAKHPQXRd+ch3a5GqqzgqL/gkvmz2nJ/9OhsU17vtM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=aI00wYsE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=6J4wPrRf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="aI00wYsE"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="6J4wPrRf" Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC0E1381135; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 08:05:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Mar 2025 08:05:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1741093533; x=1741179933; bh=GyU47ofQMv s1fMV98oT9qXwuoqfeRCfPzLX3/jtIP90=; b=aI00wYsEt6m1g+tyrLMNRlqpUD S/A+meFiliv3tkV4+ldLfr+JNpNa3paZ9LQvzvibBfrSSwtePhWlQtFhQJDLRNNZ Mbx/+51ZTKpAOLN6o3pUR67fmdtx1tHim80LMXiZhNBBAHMiJ5+Zcxkg6OqePkng cHL8b11R6J1xDKfYxSv1+MpOVGVbdKxNLdebtTKBWuLajDcaRJV/RW1vAbJ56KnH ixqd3HbmoenrqaczGV/3WODWnWO+9X+1EvtApq+d7vSExYhVXyKYUPEWVkVrP169 0PvzMRmepMlkNnKOS5WuzNUyawdosGT3bqNxctRsCIE4RjWcU2UnQz4xvOQg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1741093533; x=1741179933; bh=GyU47ofQMvs1fMV98oT9qXwuoqfeRCfPzLX 3/jtIP90=; b=6J4wPrRfVIk/h4TiMvYwwk0p1D4p7CvzBC/SAoDs0qIaFSFsK73 uuL5Gir4NPfjB6zXUEet0WuYhr/NA1rYi0XQPB0016k1n3zYM5tqFVtqVZ4h2OiK kycATQbUFiEDyfksVTEBicmSDkHCRLvz4T4zVR6lXBGu+rc5BxhbO0i1wz7fRamF Ouny4RDcrjsx2ZTG9cXhIMJ9tlxygp23j6V6tW/yna7cnWBWzqmZv3dD4fyhdNtI HNMiRj8MHbZz4jM9NIfp0bYbXiqgigFT1xzjnewSdnXHNROt3eBhBOA6nkjY/cPI VxBfSOjEKAt1qdnVQ0Z+sJWN9dJJxM3R1Lg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddutddvuddtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttder tdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosg hogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeu feejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeeigeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghr tghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhutggrshhsvg hikhhiohhshhhirhhosehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghr rdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtoh hm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 08:05:33 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lucas Seiki Oshiro Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC PATCH 0/6] Add --subject-extra-prefix flag to format-patch In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:08:43 -0800") References: <20250303220029.10716-1-lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 05:05:31 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Junio C Hamano writes: > Lucas Seiki Oshiro writes: > >> Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC PATCH 0/6] Add --subject-extra-prefix flag to format-patch > > Hmph, instead use "--rfc=GSoC" to do [GSoC PATCH n/m] and please do > not pile more "extra" on top? Or even --subject-prefix="GSoC PATCH". Once you stop treating [GSoC] as if it is an independent prefix, everything will fall into place naturally without adding anything extra. To put it differently, which one wastes more precious horizontal screen estate on the Subject line, where practically only 50 or so columns are usable? Subject: [A][B][C][D][PATCH 0/6] This is my first contribution Subject: [A B C D PATCH 0/6] This is my first contribution