From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66D7C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 23:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229596AbiCBXr2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:47:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229599AbiCBXr0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:47:26 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B753E5BD18 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC5117BF45; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:09:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=fSW9nyr5dC2m Ypp844Eo4EdUfpC6AubHUV2Vi6dCTW4=; b=AefCKfW8xYyRqr2T8gzkucLTxcjF AV2SAEOQbQ0qGzYGh60aS9J3IwOKWd5XB0Itjklyl8NKCFSMhAYBFqw8Atl2OGli 5N8Yaclunmi0hvc4FHFWtolnr94+STpx7hwZ8stNlj9y+SkVUM0fKbC+Ex103ZgI YuFjtbODR0AXNoc= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1525217BF44; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:09:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.82.80.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D4B117BF43; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:09:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Shubham Mishra , Christian Couder , Taylor Blau Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] apply tests: use "test_must_fail" instead of ad-hoc pattern References: Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 15:09:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:27:15 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DBE88DE8-9A7D-11EC-8FA2-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > test_expect_success 'apply should fail gracefully' ' > - > - if git apply --index patch > - then > - echo Oops, should not have succeeded > - false > - else > - status=3D$? && > - echo "Status was $status" && > - if test -f .git/index.lock > - then > - echo Oops, should not have crashed > - false > - fi > - fi > + test_must_fail git apply --index patch && > + test_path_is_missing .git/index.lock > ' Wow, that is very old fashioned. Thanks for cleaning up the leftover mess from the days before test_must_fail was prevalent.