From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] imap-send: Fix compilation without deprecated OpenSSL APIs
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:20:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqftuhmmtl.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAKxU2N9egn6MbJeWUWFsyYpnwOCj4=mckmkJJtVJGhmQUt36aw@mail.gmail.com
Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 10:32 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Initialization in OpenSSL has been deprecated in version 1.1.
>>
>> https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/ssl/SSL_library_init.html says
>>
>> SSL_library_init() must be called before any other action takes
>> place.
>>
>> https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/ssl/SSL_library_init.html says
>> the same.
> Later on in the document it mentions that it is deprecated.
>>
>> Which makes it necessary for us to defend the following claim
>>
>> > This makes
>> > compilation fail when deprecated APIs for OpenSSL are compile-time
>> > disabled.
>>
>> as a valid problem description more rigorously. To me, the cursory
>> web-serfing I did above makes me suspect that an OpenSSL
>> implementation with such a compile-time disabling _is_ buggy, as it
>> forbids the API users to call an API function they are told to call
>> before doing anything else.
> I agree the man page is misleading. The changelog for 1.1.0 is very
> clear though:
>
> Added support for auto-initialisation and de-initialisation of the library.
> OpenSSL no longer requires explicit init or deinit routines to be called,
> except in certain circumstances. See the OPENSSL_init_crypto() and
> OPENSSL_init_ssl() man pages for further information.
> [Matt Caswell]
All it says is explicit calls to SSL_library_init() is now optional.
It does not say it is a compile-time-error worthy offense to make
explicit init/deinit calls. Which still means that an OpenSSL
implementation with such a compile-time disabling _is_ buggy, as it
forbids the API users to call an API function they are told to call
before doing anything else.
>> > diff --git a/imap-send.c b/imap-send.c
>> > index b4eb886e2..21f741c8c 100644
>> > --- a/imap-send.c
>> > +++ b/imap-send.c
>> > @@ -284,8 +284,10 @@ static int ssl_socket_connect(struct imap_socket *sock, int use_tls_only, int ve
>> > int ret;
>> > X509 *cert;
>> >
>> > +#if (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10000000L)
>>
>> https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/crypto/OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER.html
>>
>> says that OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER is of form 0xMNNFFPPS where M is
>> major, NN is minor, FF is fix, PP is patch and S is status, and
>> gives an example that 0x00906023 stands for 0.9.6.b beta 3 (M=0,
>> NN=09, FF=06, PP=02 and S=3). So "< 0x10000000L" means "anything
>> with M smaller than 1". IOW, we would no longer call _init() for
>> e.g. "version 1.0.0 beta 0". That contradicts with the first claim
>> of the proposed log message ("deprecated in 1.1" implying that it is
>> not yet deprecated in say 1.0.2).
> This is a mistake. I will send a v2 to fix.
>
> Oh I see what I did wrong. I mistakenly copied the above
> OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER check without looking carefully at the number.
Yup, please be careful next time.
>>
>>
>>
>> > SSL_library_init();
>> > SSL_load_error_strings();
>> > +#endif
>> >
>> > meth = SSLv23_method();
>> > if (!meth) {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-28 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-27 2:35 [PATCH] imap-send: Fix compilation without deprecated OpenSSL APIs Rosen Penev
2018-12-27 6:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-27 17:55 ` Rosen Penev
2018-12-28 19:20 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqftuhmmtl.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox