From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB07120196 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751348AbcGNUJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:09:44 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53302 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751285AbcGNUJn (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:09:43 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFC22A948; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:09:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=wXxg5g8fCIFx4RukvF1L1LmNej8=; b=GrC1yP WISBNF9XG4Mfvq15Mm0kX+DGQEpjCccHdIHF8hUmH5r7h5CKvwJQ++fda2MKfDdC TyV47lZcFd2X3SSxMv9Zt9B2zSL3nSjG+gy+yk1FPR5HINw20OhhobY6KUIh/9eB PLHG+x8Iuxuotg8N0q7UTM+1anAGYLrmUvfgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=duItBTo8Wmhem1ShAafSp2prQc/n8KmJ XQNc2qa50uiGqCJ6n0Vcb9dXTgCrDcmQhxPc0faXTYnG5RL7l0ytVWqZLDIl66hz zp0Q+KwX8GUWkkjl+uY1se1RHC5ul2vkRD4Lf/ysMwyiucKU07bQ96ypRB/cFNa7 iPN7EJ6+FMk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BD72A947; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FE8C2A946; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:09:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers References: <20160630090614.GA16725@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160630090857.GB17463@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160714182108.GB16497@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:09:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:00:08 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E65B56AA-49FE-11E6-A0FC-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > OK, how about this on top of a replacement for js/t0006-for-v2.9.2 > that I'll send out as a reply to this message? I won't repeat the patch body, but I had to write a log message, so here is what I tentatively committed (not queued yet). Subject: archive-tar: huge offset and future timestamps would not work on 32-bit As we are not yet moving everything to size_t but still using ulong internally when talking about the size of object, platforms with 32-bit long will not be able to produce tar archive with 4GB+ file, and cannot grok 077777777777UL as a constant. Disable the extended header feature and do not test it on them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano