public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Tian Yuchen <cat@malon.dev>
Cc: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org, karthik.188@gmail.com,
	 phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk,  jltobler@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] builtin/mktree: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:20:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh5qj4h1z.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e448f98d-58be-409d-9ff2-ae45442dbded@malon.dev> (Tian Yuchen's message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2026 02:12:07 +0800")

Tian Yuchen <cat@malon.dev> writes:

> On 3/14/26 01:54, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I strongly disagree your idea that 'z' is more business logic than
>> 'h' is.  Both are equally relevant.
>
> Perhaps I didn't explain myself clearly :(
>
> I do understand that *currently* both are part of the business logic. 
> However, what puzzles me is: why is it written this way? Why isn't -h 
> intercepted at the outer global level, but instead handed off to a 
> function like parse_options() for interception?
>
> Is this due to historical reasons?
>
> Please forgive my slowness. I would appreciate it if you could offer 
> some guidance!

It is perfectly OK to be slow.  Spend enough time to study the code
so that you do not have to ask for forgiveness ;-)

In order to make a useful response to "-h", that business logic
needs to know what options are available and what argument they take
etc., which is already given to parse_options API.  What makes it
make any sense to split it to separate codepath?


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-13 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 18:17 [PATCH v1] builtin/mktree: remove USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE Tian Yuchen
2026-03-12  6:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-12 16:21   ` Tian Yuchen
2026-03-13  7:02     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-13 16:03     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-13 17:15       ` Tian Yuchen
2026-03-13 17:54         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-13 18:12           ` Tian Yuchen
2026-03-13 20:20             ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-03-14  3:17               ` Tian Yuchen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh5qj4h1z.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=cat@malon.dev \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox