From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75EBF36AB67 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 16:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769012411; cv=none; b=DGKGIxJmlIyrA1A1Sbc1DvxYFiu6GoP5pB1gboWt6Z5p9N0PRDVgy5kpJj3wB3E9JiNH0mBh26MAUk7SYgPfXvN3zpKbQf9ot4FYL3V8UieAs1acoGAJjvAPg0Ln8bF9ymGHQW8yT5bKRWHQnG6RpdK9p3OzwV9XfcrccF+aLaQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769012411; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tbrt8tOOvzadoTAx6YmhlTvuZ7z6QF1H74dOBdZlVWU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nuNWAeLfbwnI/WpRQLTRnbbSj86dVQTnoz6WXQL+W1q6xb0UmekSXGJ59M75cErh/faPOcarGiLREQm9SBRXhjDNYCVhIpEcBm3RfmNTOWs22k/BOCsBjIR1FrVmu3uLBSlzVFdEsbXQVxgtzzTSbaidrzI0ac83KCPCBRbRTbA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=czs26LaE; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=aQcPYPL1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="czs26LaE"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="aQcPYPL1" Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40131400155; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:20:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:20:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1769012405; x=1769098805; bh=ljYDsmxtAS pIyrZIsNfe6rSgATF1CKQGvWGCNu+JQ40=; b=czs26LaEMqLAY36aMAWDfASu9y JEkfUHJarxXlzrQpFNhwDA40EqhLv0/TsuQ+5mJfLz2KrOoeJ14DUiKz3Z1dMqPC sYmSe8R7mDYG2JdZAK3+L0SLZ5HIriBqEZNkFcuS+HZCnvzgsHqG8+tIhLc+oyfV nQV0jwwhW6iixi91EobPb8ixpQRzNByLk8xgixwzFc8KmLW6vm5UsV4YqZwmj5Q/ kTe4+kGyW2d8OXsri98/V/oSQsQEg/LkSMFdoRwxyoJ3Vl5ritpUL/yhvx8AyTuX 2CZ4q75kZJCcZpWhe+7FGlGqsdeKi3yxAa/laeQZk20RQUbQ0c6JeMiFTMFQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1769012405; x=1769098805; bh=ljYDsmxtASpIyrZIsNfe6rSgATF1CKQGvWG CNu+JQ40=; b=aQcPYPL1iNLMJBWiWBM5+PP7Lnuz0UyXcIpZOEKG0a0p1W6vbhh 0T+92P7OXW66Nooe1K1dcqfT5umDQFaQaTKHhNi2ez3A1UcKSj69e4K0/Vjj+tzd te9jgDvbg3Q8VZKhHLqC/D5ieMJN5k7g/K7oKgUKgrV/nHPrk6f3f7jAmqLXEOB0 29FWoJkdVj9FUIe3y2dC/If107cwNQuvUmV1VkY8N+N5/OtfLKwMbGDL/BePpySG tPDrhmqn6pTO1BbXf2U3nMzfulFGpwEGLLfewYvyWcc4/arOYf/vk8Dz80GNbT4z eSh8yttJ4T5A6EdotU091o/Sm1avvMUgWBg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddugeefjeehucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinhesgh hmgidruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgt phhtthhopegsvghnrdhknhhosghlvgesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjie htsehkuggsghdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:20:03 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ben Knoble , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2026, #06) In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 21 Jan 2026 07:26:40 -0800") References: <97d8645b-bae8-7f5c-8e59-0f4f0efd92f5@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:20:00 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Junio C Hamano writes: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >>> ... >>> - Merge branch 'js/prep-symlink-windows' into js/symlink-windows >>> (this branch uses js/prep-symlink-windows.) >>> >>> Upstream symbolic link support on Windows from Git-for-Windows. >>> >>> Expecting a reroll. >>> cf. <5fe64b77-d10b-b66e-8622-14bec1e96f4a@gmx.de> >>> cf. <14388349-d1b5-fc8f-b6c7-4a7b43e64494@gmx.de> >>> cf. <704e952d-7924-00ce-b8b0-ad355e659335@gmx.de> >>> source: >> >> I do not quite understand. >> >> v2 was sent out on Jan 9. The three replies you are referring to as >> blockers were all sent out on the same day, as replies to the respective >> reviewer comments in v1. Naturally, whan I did sent out those replies >> acknowleding problems whose fixes I promised, I did not then go on and >> omit the fixes from v2! > > Sorry, my mistake. It is very possible that the references may be > stale for this topic, as I can forget update them when I queue a > newer iteration. > > Will take a look later today. Thanks. I think I understood what happened. You send those referenced messages to v1 review comments at the same time or after you sent v2, and said "I'll drop this" or "I'll do that" in them, which confused me into thinking "oh, after sending the v2 Dscho realized there were still some things to be addressed and responded to v1 reviews?", hence these references. Sorry about the confusion. Let's mark it for 'next'. As the "prep" topic will be part of -rc1, I really didn't want just half the topic in the upcoming release while leaving out the other half out of it. Thanks for pinging.