git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,  git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] refs: add a '--required' flag to 'git refs optimize'
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 07:37:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh5w250lw.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwm4y538p.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2025 06:40:38 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Perhaps "--check-" followed by a word specific to what we are trying
> to achieve (e.g., if we are trying to see if auto-compaction is
> necessary, "--check-for-auto" "check for auto compaction")?  I
> dunno.

After reading what you did in the previou step, I am reasonably sure
"required" is a wrong word to use, with or without other words like
"check".  Semantically it is similar to the should_pack_refs() check
that we use for pack-refs even before "optimize" came.  We expect it
to answer this question cheaply: are we better off if we repacked,
or can we go on without repacking for now?  It is not about "are we
performing so poorly that we MUST optimize now?"

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-13 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-10 10:27 [PATCH 0/9] refs: add a '--required' flag to 'git refs optimize' Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] refs: move to using the '.optimize' functions Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  8:18     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] refs: cleanup code around optimization Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  8:22     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] refs: rename 'pack_refs_opts' to 'optimize_refs_opts' Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  8:52     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] t/pack-refs-tests: move the 'test_done' to callees Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  8:54     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] t/t0450: split whitespace consistency check per subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  9:01     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-13 11:10       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  9:04     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13  9:46     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 10:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] refs: add a '--required' flag to 'git refs optimize' Karthik Nayak
2025-10-10 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13 12:37     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-13 13:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-13 14:37       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-10-14 15:08         ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-14 17:46           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-15  7:50             ` Srivastava, Nitin
2025-10-15  8:19             ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-15  9:29               ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-15 12:14                 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-15 20:17                   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh5w250lw.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).