From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0FCC285C95 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758059614; cv=none; b=CdU7fpvM+aKMuzU4iT71lsi8XwD4KJj9k3CuvDnHF4ijYtQ2aUQjuk98PCZ/0atE0qRCDe+WFkJSmD3jnSxqbVqTd4J7XdBBtqyssgvCP5hLeo+t2pzDzpNmnuCBbuS0zRi0vZ4+28LmbsZzG/RC/J0S/iEWUk++aQMN4lxu9lo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758059614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+wzXslYdWfLuPtxJGlu+XMrQMzRgF65jKnzrexVy54Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JHKxh+elNhrv0fUiYc0NrWMRiIgacULiRseVKgEqcQYDNsAYNBKI5v8HsSqyWBpeK4fFReQQjl5z9wvqYfMOJyo0/fvuUhUPgYhGrLxYulKC4ky5YPTby7459x3pz/qPctmxNmtHDb8wuIMxZgI8Gy51EA/LaAz1QvFHVKuqa08= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=rvV2dj3p; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ZuEIGtLG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="rvV2dj3p"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ZuEIGtLG" Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BF2EC01FA; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:53:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:53:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1758059610; x=1758146010; bh=xwJ3TM8A0N V46QiQqABSF4YACXzoAI3jRj7Eico+C74=; b=rvV2dj3pFt4Wdiz4QBiNZcQEuN AHCsT8jUJsdYClNDcyx0UiBRx0EgvyjlSqvzZgMa7IPMlSCpiUC5EVL//rtJMyIy oJYJ9DfeHjykV4XDD6KkO0mTQThoiFAU8AQm04uttZRRZanKco2xEMkgs0UinXAx 2evltLDKPiT87DEjpZab8DlGqBO01JbB02jXUduoQRn9EfCEcYFh26KzucGrde1g Paan0cfOLQD2sxG0AinfXMEgu1cpNwtgARFYcG1raT2eTYkQ+sYklNYYBBPOyIQT taVqc5rPZDDdXdOHAoFCqHBSMjE+6jc/ipy/6VbxsbXVHravCp6Yg1OFDyrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1758059610; x=1758146010; bh=xwJ3TM8A0NV46QiQqABSF4YACXzoAI3jRj7 Eico+C74=; b=ZuEIGtLGOZhEhoZNuFmYu64wpnilTODGRlL6Q42pWEZnCPL43Cw QlG3vItlSm/HMDpHpu4APlLm2tWOCIOQFVFO7On3SIYncPDBQOyLPzR8tKwpYbnY n28KhEb2ujGLLhpeSpwThtmtiT8d8a+jwrG0FcuUEWWaupknFHeYh7ld6FD79nBZ 03VSqgJqAsOQcO3PNvGA+gjZ4DPdvk9/OkW+SPE4VF/8FiQlC4RWGe2ZbYDG/4hZ 80cazkKtxqsXf+1iRYjsbz7J4EB83vrcITeNIpqYPCiIWCEEhTd/0p549NbNGTAR D6bezAO5mchbepcgyJU5h+bOw/hs8bLImKg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdegudejtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucev ucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeettddtveffueeiieelffeftdeigfefkeevteevveeutdelhfdtudfgledtjeel udenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdp nhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepkhgrrh hthhhikhdrudekkeesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdr khgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhovgdrughrvgifsehinhguvgigvgigtg hhrghnghgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphht thhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtg homh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:53:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Karthik Nayak Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, joe.drew@indexexchange.com, peff@peff.net, ps@pks.im Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] refs/files: fix issues with git-fetch on case-insensitive FS In-Reply-To: <20250913-587-git-fetch-1-fails-fetches-on-case-insensitive-repositories-v3-0-195569740b57@gmail.com> (Karthik Nayak's message of "Sat, 13 Sep 2025 22:54:28 +0200") References: <20250902-587-git-fetch-1-fails-fetches-on-case-insensitive-repositories-v1-0-35e69bbb507d@gmail.com> <20250913-587-git-fetch-1-fails-fetches-on-case-insensitive-repositories-v3-0-195569740b57@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:53:28 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Karthik Nayak writes: > Changes in v3: > - Rename duplicate_reference_case_cmp() to > transaction_has_case_conflicting_update() and add comments. > - Improve commit messages. > - Add an additional test in the 4th commit to showcase D/F conflicts in > case-sensistive file systems. > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250908-587-git-fetch-1-fails-fetches-on-case-insensitive-repositories-v2-0-b2eb2459befb@gmail.com I think I like this "latest first and then historical" order in the cover letter much better than the other way around. I see that this topic is pretty much done? There still are a few questions from Justin's reply that may want to be answered, but I have a feeling that the answer to them would not require a new iteration. Looking good. Thanks.