From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Zheng Yuting <05zyt30@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, meetsoni3017@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC PATCH v7 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 23:00:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh63jotn4.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250323022111.20226-3-05ZYT30@gmail.com> (Zheng Yuting's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2025 10:21:11 +0800")
Zheng Yuting <05zyt30@gmail.com> writes:
> + if ($error) {
This block is full of overly long lines. Would it make sense to
turn it into a helper sub and do just this here in the block
return handle_smtp_error($error);
And then the remainder of the block would become a single helper
function that is called only from here, losing 2 levels of
indentation.
> + # check if an error was captured
> + # parse SMTP status code from error message in:
> + # https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.html
> + if ($error =~ /\b(\d{3})\b/) {
> + my $status_code = $1;
> + if ($status_code =~ /^4/) {
> + # 4yz: Transient Negative Completion reply
> + warn "SMTP temporary error (status code $status_code): $error";
> + return 1;
> + } elsif ($status_code =~ /^5/) {
> + # 5yz: Permanent Negative Completion reply
> + warn "SMTP permanent error (status code $status_code): $error";
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + # if no recognized status code is found, treat as transient error
> + warn "SMTP unknown error: $error. Treating as permanent failure.";
The comment and warning message say different things. I suspect
that the warning message is wrong, as the branch returns 1 to signal
the caller to do the same thing a the 4yz transient case?
> + return 1;
> + }
> + } else {
> + # if no status code is found, treat as transient error
> + warn "SMTP generic error: $error";
> + return 1;
> + }
> + } elsif (!defined $result) {
> + # if no error and no result is returned, treat as transient error
> + warn "SMTP no result error: $error";
> + return 1;
> + }
> + else {
> + return $result ? 1 : 0;
> + }
> });
>
> return $auth;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 6:46 [GSoC PATCH v3 0/1] Refactor SMTP Auth Error Handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-12 6:46 ` [GSoC PATCH v3 1/1] Unify SMTP auth error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-13 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 12:55 ` Yuting Zheng
2025-03-16 5:09 ` [GSoC PATCH v4 0/2] smtp_auth_maybe: unified error capture and status code processing optimization Zheng Yuting
2025-03-16 5:09 ` [GSoC PATCH v4 1/2] Unify capture of SMTP errors Zheng Yuting
2025-03-16 5:09 ` [GSoC PATCH v4 2/2] Error handling for SMTP status codes Zheng Yuting
2025-03-17 23:01 ` [GSoC PATCH v4 0/2] smtp_auth_maybe: unified error capture and status code processing optimization Junio C Hamano
2025-03-19 2:02 ` [GSoC PATCH v5 0/2] sendemail: improve error capture and status code handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-19 2:02 ` [GSoC PATCH v5 1/2] sendemail: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-19 2:02 ` [GSoC PATCH v5 2/2] sendemail: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-19 6:35 ` [GSoC PATCH v5 0/2] sendemail: improve error capture and status code handling Meet Soni
2025-03-21 2:51 ` [GSoC PATCH v6 0/2] send-email: " Zheng Yuting
2025-03-21 2:51 ` [GSoC PATCH v6 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-21 2:51 ` [GSoC PATCH v6 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-21 15:38 ` [GSoC PATCH v6 0/2] send-email: improve error capture and status code handling Junio C Hamano
2025-03-23 2:21 ` [GSoC PATCH v7 " Zheng Yuting
2025-03-23 2:21 ` [GSoC PATCH v7 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-23 2:21 ` [GSoC PATCH v7 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-24 6:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-03-24 14:53 ` [GSoC PATCH v8 0/2] send-email: improve error capture and status code handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-24 14:53 ` [GSoC PATCH v8 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-24 14:53 ` [GSoC PATCH v8 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-25 15:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-26 7:52 ` [GSoC PATCH v9 0/2] send-email: improve error capture and status code handling Zheng Yuting
2025-03-26 7:52 ` [GSoC PATCH v9 1/2] send-email: capture errors in an eval {} block Zheng Yuting
2025-03-26 7:52 ` [GSoC PATCH v9 2/2] send-email: finer-grained SMTP error handling Zheng Yuting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqh63jotn4.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=05zyt30@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meetsoni3017@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).