From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFB181C4A0E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737583992; cv=none; b=dYi4cyLdV4NHxZTDmbivQLwVYsSlpvLXQYLftutzxIPLaMGdzbKx+JhFPna34NvDwzKnBHQpu9DwidRU86/VYgslyrArEUbyVz4SszLscr98JtprZsyg+ManpY2S0hyFLOpq6CgNI6z6qdv5htQ9dJBfUOollpr9ealvTpSAdSw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737583992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z4wzbUAsK/UMqBWrrAIyLyfCYEaojluWbFJmeaGF+oo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZwQ570S3euNlhYDcgD4pA/rxUki+gpg1pjowa/oPKiWijt6k9gRkvpCjzcLGgN125CcWJuAXacp1Cf18jXsy6mt+eNP+uaXnPp01nsuSurahnUvI5xY7CRKZf3a+S0G2Unln8MEApqTFEf0z0sHyeTpwv/GUXepysiUX32ZHOoo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=h0iFzzR3; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=P1qBrMst; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="h0iFzzR3"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="P1qBrMst" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98D3138020D; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:13:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:13:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1737583989; x=1737670389; bh=tJAFtY0XvF wcAuqs71ciWDoRKDvUzxWg1fvsXZ6qpnc=; b=h0iFzzR3AZWnabbNag3GSrfnWR j0F1Oz8oOD+T9s6LOLxwZ+jLC83d5pM63TRNw85v0KqDKagliR253gIgx4D+ElG4 M92190d30Oi8yxGzXBJ02sApOC/ov29FvOUwKDg8WDS2oHtZGH4IBiGgL1tXiGJL I9RaCDR/A8jxr+KD+7htZegpjqKH7VRP3qCy9AbDeHDDW3t+sWdk0xTC3PBreFsN e+qxMLLbTAuexbMQ7osau3zDDRLm5y7ySqTgaCcV605+wdwes/xs3S//ilfKJjxM iVzH4171xSZclMMBghRIvupjaVEX5QTlrlf9RqGfHyTX3re2rDZhZhQVyabw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1737583989; x=1737670389; bh=tJAFtY0XvFwcAuqs71ciWDoRKDvUzxWg1fv sXZ6qpnc=; b=P1qBrMstZpScZ4niCdH1vhpSBfHw3y2NJ+eaU9SSa1ZGC9zvico axX04hj8ICwIBt834d3LajD6uzaHU93ExEQy5jvuj199f0gTkAAYF/LG36LancK7 SVFH5sg//iqwJLVG+aBkUWjAkxxKkTdX50lv21wZWXOE+aar/irqZieymAVUFHgU LrpanvqUZK2pG0WGr2eznqw+8CgoHjGvPQzWhnWPZ1j9Iz8DJczvGis2Hl7kVIzb eC1zXW/QKLn5eUrMfGnvKYeXtrmlzv7Mg4Gp4/UfXQpTB/ByLL+bjuHp1tt5+Fvv 5nYXfGGzgKoT44SewGafooz74nRyfBRs4YQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudejfedgvdekudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredt necuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsoh igrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueef jeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgt phhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmvgesthhtrgihlh horhhrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtohhlvggvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsh htvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:13:09 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Derrick Stolee , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2025, #05; Fri, 17) In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:30:01 -0500") References: <1331d214-890e-4b47-87c6-44f445172bb2@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:13:07 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Taylor Blau writes: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:30:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Derrick Stolee writes: >> >> > On 1/17/25 7:42 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > >> >> * ds/name-hash-tweaks (2024-12-20) 8 commits >> ... >> I am happy with the updated function that gives us better of both >> worlds, without losing too much from the "renamed from other >> directory" while making sure we do not lose too many bits in deeper >> trees. > > I had a couple of thoughts that I meant to share before the holiday > break, and haven't quite had a chance to get to it now that I'm back at > my desk. > > Let me try and find some time to respond to the latest round of this > series, and apologies for holding it up in the meantime. The topic has been stalled for unusually long time, so it won't hurt too much for it to wait for a few more days, but it wouldn't be fair to stall a topic further with just a promise to "try and find time" forever. Let's say we'll go ahead by this weekend unless we hear otherwise? I am not ultra-happy with the last step, as I personally do not see this different algorithm as "version" (in that people would always want to use version N+1 over version N when both are available) but as "variant" (in that there may be prefer to use variant N over variant N+1 depending on the circumstances), but that may be just the matter of terminology. What's important is to make sure we do not mix two algorhtims up while creating a packfile. Thanks.