From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37573186A for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 04:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721278346; cv=none; b=NYQY3yHx2VMqyWspfsg8HLXKpoB3l91GRKi4RUM1EKd2qML+T2PXLBSh15vJkXP2aENa/RSlZkTKZ9Zv1BNfCvjaFdkQhgJAVYjs4uAF4qw1E22GdrmV6EHjmaUNR+hzmdXgKnTBvw2W700L/bbAv5TZNTINv5Q9fE2hEv3upzA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721278346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6QIV0sQYLtZ6J7syF0Xl31VUC8jqBlbAIEGroWK1gwQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XMF2gihfP8bYGIY1bA+mqyp9sp7+zOGm1lan5p4dsCa1CznkTpBkaUJpnZqjvF8+H5VTYFeNZ3sYFotgBNU4QwEluXYljDx8xcJWyUZpWCm1Df09CprxHs869vuGi4kmjjaLPs8yFkt6fkBNuVoL96LAmYsGSdEBUCd9YawEKKU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=L9sR1+4v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="L9sR1+4v" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13AA39BCB; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:52:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6QIV0sQYLtZ6J7syF0Xl31VUC8jqBlbAIEGroW K1gwQ=; b=L9sR1+4vf85qFzqEJ1sUKxIRfOuANNiGAtYYMI6GYTsT3DQzYUgDui JBRL39DCP5s2X5TCqXGau0L+VuYFGJN3EyS2TYvNtzkuWigIaZka16pM7mnL+KzH w5K8iVi6EsQ2PfFELM7O1dDCfudnfc6v1+dxNxaL7xHMbsO1tiFMU= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A9639BCA; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:52:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4573F39BC9; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:52:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Ramsay Jones Cc: Jeff King , GIT Mailing-list , Patrick Steinhardt , Adam Dinwoodie Subject: Re: v2.46.0-rc0 test failures on cygwin In-Reply-To: (Ramsay Jones's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2024 02:22:30 +0100") References: <20240717064241.GF547635@coredump.intra.peff.net> <3e6abe6c-2c15-47f9-89e8-3e8710802562@ramsayjones.plus.com> <20240718005723.GA675057@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:52:18 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 83D5F2DA-44C1-11EF-8B63-DFF1FEA446E2-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Ramsay Jones writes: > On 18/07/2024 01:57, Jeff King wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 07:05:43PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > [snip] > >>> I also don't know the code well enough to answer your question regarding >>> the re-opening of the migrated ref-store, but it doesn't look like it would >>> cause any problems (famous last words). >> >> Thanks for testing. This is new in the upcoming release, but I think >> it's localized to the "git ref migrate" command. So aside from the >> annoyance of the test failure for you, it is not too urgent. I'm tempted >> to put it off until Patrick has had a chance to weigh in, even if it >> means missing the v2.46 cutoff. > > Yes, I think it would be better for Patrick to take a look. I added Adam to > the CC list to keep him in the loop (because he is the cygwin git package > maintainer); he may have a view on the timing issues. > > Personally, I would be fine with a post v2.46 fix, but it is not up to me. :) Thanks. I am inclined to postpone it after 2.46 final, and not to disturb Patrick during his honeymoon.