From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270FA20DC4 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 19:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716404451; cv=none; b=oIcmSISFA/0yNmXQJUbZBvUA5n3LcddMvvWt5RYiPVA4PJm2fWGrQoQnSEL6Bo30mMW3og5/D4WP5yS3/cRncCZOGxaAGAbNjX4MydhyPvGM+ew5/y1MNbg0gfI8GMJ9AmFpcL9DFG2ewYgWh/7I0wKVjAN20MJdXW88IOB+Qgk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716404451; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E/XKuvWTDQY2jLPzJNsSqflZySz+eBtHZwtF+Zn/zP8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b/UP013ZiqIMmbEyV9I4Jj1reJqCzyC/5BT3vpLqsJU+kWgqLXd2eXZlwmjGGUJ1TfAQPN+rT+sj3HhFEbO/nnmIVwTItDSlbDkP3VbALBBTrT3/zqfPJUUXAYd6fd+exLE5tquTPxg9tfYHAGynmFz2wN+6OlOSmLfQ8pIxwFE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=Cl6I28qX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Cl6I28qX" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E49192F0; Wed, 22 May 2024 15:00:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=E/XKuvWTDQY2jLPzJNsSqflZySz+eBtHZwtF+Z n/zP8=; b=Cl6I28qXNVLAO/lDAn0plRJNAjn0u2fmnBdhIRBMDqZ34QLPm0BK6T eDyAjd5BLxcWqVV9C4UDBb0ribSdsq4PWCTKcwlfBa1gdsBhkrAz5suaw+hZorVU SFCNlUanoGeMrw48rxA6IVNySE44jkwmAr5pvUBDq2fhlDawQwbYc= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A211192EF; Wed, 22 May 2024 15:00:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.173.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85D9E192EE; Wed, 22 May 2024 15:00:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n?= , Eric Sunshine , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] chainlint.pl: fix incorrect CPU count on Linux SPARC In-Reply-To: (Eric Sunshine's message of "Wed, 22 May 2024 05:05:26 -0400") References: <20240520111109.99882-1-glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20240520190131.94904-1-ericsunshine@charter.net> <20240520190131.94904-3-ericsunshine@charter.net> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 12:00:45 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 98CA29D4-186D-11EF-91AA-A19503B9AAD1-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Eric Sunshine writes: >> > > "CPUnn:" in /proc/cpuinfo instead of the usual "processor NN:". >> > >> > not sure if worth a reroll, but the "usual" syntax is "processor : NN" > ... > Inclusion of the word "usual" is such a minor flaw in the commit > message that I doubt it warrants a reroll and the associated cost on > reviewers and on the maintainer (Junio), especially since it does not > negatively impact the intent conveyed by the commit messages nor the > correctness of the actual patch. > > As such, I'm not worried about it. Whether Junio reads this and wants > to correct it in his tree is up to him, of course. I think "usual" is not what was pointed out. The order between the colon and NN is.