* [PATCH] show-branch: --no-sparse should give dense output
@ 2023-07-19 11:37 Junio C Hamano
2023-07-19 16:32 ` [PATCH] show-branch: reject --[no-](topo|date)-order Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2023-07-19 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
"git show-branch --no-sparse" behaved exactly the same way as "git
show-branch --sparse", which did not make any sense. This was
because it used a variable "dense" initialized to 1 by default to
give "non sparse" behaviour, and OPT_SET_INT() to set the varilable
to 0 in response to the "--sparse" option. Unfortunately,
OPT_SET_INT() sets 0 to the given variable when the option is
negated.
Flip the polarity of the variable "dense" by renaming it to "sparse"
and initializing it to 0, and have OPT_SET_INT() set the variable to
1 when "--sparse" is given. This way, "--no-sparse" would set 0 to
the variable and would give us the "dense" behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
builtin/show-branch.c | 8 ++++----
t/t3202-show-branch.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/show-branch.c b/builtin/show-branch.c
index 7ef4a642c1..67f3ef0639 100644
--- a/builtin/show-branch.c
+++ b/builtin/show-branch.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ int cmd_show_branch(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
int with_current_branch = 0;
int head_at = -1;
int topics = 0;
- int dense = 1;
+ int sparse = 0;
const char *reflog_base = NULL;
struct option builtin_show_branch_options[] = {
OPT_BOOL('a', "all", &all_heads,
@@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ int cmd_show_branch(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER),
OPT_BOOL(0, "topics", &topics,
N_("show only commits not on the first branch")),
- OPT_SET_INT(0, "sparse", &dense,
- N_("show merges reachable from only one tip"), 0),
+ OPT_SET_INT(0, "sparse", &sparse,
+ N_("show merges reachable from only one tip"), 1),
OPT_SET_INT(0, "date-order", &sort_order,
N_("topologically sort, maintaining date order "
"where possible"),
@@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ int cmd_show_branch(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
!is_merge_point &&
(this_flag & (1u << REV_SHIFT)))
continue;
- if (dense && is_merge &&
+ if (!sparse && is_merge &&
omit_in_dense(commit, rev, num_rev))
continue;
for (i = 0; i < num_rev; i++) {
diff --git a/t/t3202-show-branch.sh b/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
index be20ebe1d5..ca7c44f0f7 100755
--- a/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
+++ b/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
@@ -119,6 +119,22 @@ test_expect_success 'show branch --remotes' '
test_must_be_empty actual.out
'
+test_expect_success 'show-branch --sparse' '
+ test_when_finished "git checkout branch10 && git branch -D branchA" &&
+ git checkout -b branchA branch10 &&
+ git merge -s ours -m "merge 1 and 10 to make A" branch1 &&
+ git commit --allow-empty -m "another" &&
+
+ git show-branch --sparse >out &&
+ grep "merge 1 and 10 to make A" out &&
+
+ git show-branch >out &&
+ ! grep "merge 1 and 10 to make A" out &&
+
+ git show-branch --no-sparse >out &&
+ ! grep "merge 1 and 10 to make A" out
+'
+
test_expect_success 'setup show branch --list' '
sed "s/^> //" >expect <<-\EOF
> [branch1] branch1
--
2.41.0-376-gcba07a324d
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] show-branch: reject --[no-](topo|date)-order
2023-07-19 11:37 [PATCH] show-branch: --no-sparse should give dense output Junio C Hamano
@ 2023-07-19 16:32 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2023-07-19 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
"git show-branch --no-topo-order" behaved exactly the same way as
"git show-branch --topo-order" did, which was nonsense. This was
because we choose between topo- and date- by setting a variable to
either REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER or REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE with
OPT_SET_INT() and REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER happens to be 0. The
OPT_SET_INTO() macro assigns 0 to the target variable in respose to
the negated form of its option.
"--no-date-order" by luck behaves identically to "--topo-order"
exactly for the same reason, and it sort-of makes sense right now,
but the "sort-of makes sense" will quickly break down once we add a
third way to sort. Not-A may be B when there are only two choices
between A and B, but once your choices become among A, B, and C,
not-A does not mean B.
Just mark these two ordering options to reject negation, and add a
test, which was missing. "git show-branch --no-reflog" is also
unnegatable, so throw in a test for that while we are at it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
* Comes on top of the "--no-sparse should mean dense" patch.
builtin/show-branch.c | 14 +++++++-------
t/t3202-show-branch.sh | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git c/builtin/show-branch.c w/builtin/show-branch.c
index 67f3ef0639..b574afb7c3 100644
--- c/builtin/show-branch.c
+++ w/builtin/show-branch.c
@@ -667,17 +667,17 @@ int cmd_show_branch(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
N_("show possible merge bases")),
OPT_BOOL(0, "independent", &independent,
N_("show refs unreachable from any other ref")),
- OPT_SET_INT(0, "topo-order", &sort_order,
- N_("show commits in topological order"),
- REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER),
+ OPT_SET_INT_F(0, "topo-order", &sort_order,
+ N_("show commits in topological order"),
+ REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER, PARSE_OPT_NONEG),
OPT_BOOL(0, "topics", &topics,
N_("show only commits not on the first branch")),
OPT_SET_INT(0, "sparse", &sparse,
N_("show merges reachable from only one tip"), 1),
- OPT_SET_INT(0, "date-order", &sort_order,
- N_("topologically sort, maintaining date order "
- "where possible"),
- REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE),
+ OPT_SET_INT_F(0, "date-order", &sort_order,
+ N_("topologically sort, maintaining date order "
+ "where possible"),
+ REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE, PARSE_OPT_NONEG),
OPT_CALLBACK_F('g', "reflog", &reflog_base, N_("<n>[,<base>]"),
N_("show <n> most recent ref-log entries starting at "
"base"),
diff --git c/t/t3202-show-branch.sh w/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
index ca7c44f0f7..b17f388f56 100755
--- c/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
+++ w/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@ done <<\EOF
--reflog --current
EOF
+# unnegatable options
+for opt in topo-order date-order reflog
+do
+ test_expect_success "show-branch --no-$opt (should fail)" '
+ test_must_fail git show-branch --no-$opt 2>err &&
+ grep "unknown option .no-$opt." err
+ '
+done
+
test_expect_success 'error descriptions on non-existent branch' '
cat >expect <<-EOF &&
error: No branch named '\''non-existent'\'.'
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-19 16:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-19 11:37 [PATCH] show-branch: --no-sparse should give dense output Junio C Hamano
2023-07-19 16:32 ` [PATCH] show-branch: reject --[no-](topo|date)-order Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).