From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled by default
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:22:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh6tb7bsa.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6784ddfe2906f7c04b3050bd9ba63a884ddb047.1681850424.git.me@ttaylorr.com> (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:40:57 -0400")
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
> diff --git a/Documentation/config/feature.txt b/Documentation/config/feature.txt
> index e52bc6b858..17b4d39f89 100644
> --- a/Documentation/config/feature.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/config/feature.txt
> @@ -14,9 +14,6 @@ feature.experimental::
> +
> * `fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=skipping` may improve fetch negotiation times by
> skipping more commits at a time, reducing the number of round trips.
> -+
> -* `gc.cruftPacks=true` reduces disk space used by unreachable objects during
> -garbage collection, preventing loose object explosions.
Being listed here is a definite sign that a feature behind a
configuration variable is considered experimental. Do we have (and
if not, do we want to establish) a procedure to mark and announce a
feature that used to be experimental no longer is? If it is enough
to mention it in the release notes, then I can take care of it, of
course.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 20:54 [PATCH 00/10] gc: enable cruft packs by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles() Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:30 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:40 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] builtin/repack.c: fix incorrect reference to '-C' Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-17 23:03 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:39 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 14:54 ` Derrick Stolee
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] t/t5304-prune.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] t/t9300-fast-import.sh: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:43 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:44 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack tests Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test cases Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:48 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:48 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] t/t6501-freshen-objects.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:56 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:50 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-22 11:23 ` Jeff King
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 11:00 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:52 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-17 20:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 11:02 ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 11:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] gc: enable cruft packs by default Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:53 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] pack-write.c: plug a leak in stage_tmp_packfiles() Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 16:31 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-20 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] builtin/repack.c: fix incorrect reference to '-C' Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] builtin/gc.c: ignore cruft packs with `--keep-largest-pack` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/t5304-prune.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/t6501-freshen-objects.sh: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: refactor cruft pack tests Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/t6500-gc.sh: add additional test cases Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/t9300-fast-import.sh: prepare for `gc --cruft` by default Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled " Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-04-20 17:24 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-20 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-20 19:19 ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] repository.h: drop unused `gc_cruft_packs` Taylor Blau
2023-04-19 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqh6tb7bsa.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).