Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Mario Grgic <mario_grgic@hotmail.com>,
	demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git bug: Perl compatible regular expressions do not work as expected
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:29:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh6u6cg4l.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eba23dc4-c036-fd1b-a1f0-028e8fff602b@web.de> ("René Scharfe"'s message of "Sat, 25 Mar 2023 19:09:35 +0100")

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:

> Am 25.03.23 um 14:09 schrieb Mario Grgic:
>> The lowercase -p is to print the output in patch format. You can rewrite the command line as
>>
>>  git log --all --patch --perl-regexp -G '\bmain\b’
>>
>> I still get no output in any git version after 2.38.4
>
> -G doesn't support Perl regular expressions.  --perl-regexp only affects
> --grep, --grep-reflog, --author, and --committer.  Neither POSIX basic
> nor extended regular expressions support \b as word boundary.  GNU regex
> and our compat/regex/ do, as extensions.  macOS regex supports it if the
> flag REG_ENHANCED is given to regcomp(3).

Good summary to unconfuse speculations in the thread.

> So perhaps this is rather a feature request to support Perl regular
> expressions for -G (and probably -S as well).  

Perhaps.  I used to be a "it would be wonderful if pcre were usable
everywhere" dreamer, but after seeing our share of bugs caused by
use of pcre, I am not a huge proponent anymore.  I do not object to
such an enhancement at all, as long as it is done cleanly and in
such a way that it is clear pcre cannot be used by accident when the
user does not ask for it.

> Or to enable REG_ENHANCED
> for them, at least, like 54463d32ef (use enhanced basic regular
> expressions on macOS, 2023-01-08) did to get alternations for git grep
> on macOS.

This one sounds like a reasonable thing, which may not have huge
unintended fallout, to do.  I am a bit surprised that we have to
cover each individual callsite of regcomp(3), though.  Doesn't the
54463d32ef fix use "#define regcomp git_regcomp" to cover everybody?




  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-27 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-25 12:31 git bug: Perl compatible regular expressions do not work as expected Mario Grgic
2023-03-25 12:42 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-03-25 12:59   ` Mario Grgic
2023-03-25 13:04 ` demerphq
2023-03-25 13:09   ` Mario Grgic
2023-03-25 13:24     ` demerphq
2023-03-25 18:09     ` René Scharfe
2023-03-27 16:29       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-27 17:23         ` René Scharfe
2023-03-27 21:33           ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-28 13:47             ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-28 17:56               ` René Scharfe
2023-03-25 14:16 ` Mario Grgic
2023-03-25 15:39 ` Mario Grgic
2023-03-27 16:30   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-27 17:22     ` Mario Grgic
2023-03-27 21:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-28  0:03         ` Mario Grgic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh6u6cg4l.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=demerphq@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=mario_grgic@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox