From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439ACC19F21 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235487AbiHDUVH (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:21:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232290AbiHDUVG (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:21:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F9E24F1E for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2561BEF43; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:20:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=eBNZRg236hLqrkFcm/YSppb/Ho9WkmGXdbj2LM d4mYM=; b=ptz0FCeQedmejYfSNJzE67EwvQqe3Yy2I/T6NBMPtt4NkwBy0L/1DA 3QbGTHseP9l+1CQ7W5zxiZ2J4zEKlZFmJMs3JqZX4PHaA/VzvsUWs5gum0gddt74 Kj3k877hqPmcGN3qwZmczmicGIxpN+YgsLSwcckRBrOKHs51zD2XA= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847991BEF42; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:20:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.145.39.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3716C1BEF41; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:20:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Elia Pinto , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Jeff King , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: cache glibc version check References: <53cffc06-ebb1-ac97-ceb4-4c242a82c68a@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 13:20:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <53cffc06-ebb1-ac97-ceb4-4c242a82c68a@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:16:12 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F22ED4A2-1432-11ED-877B-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: > it. Having just read Peff's message this does not make much difference > to the test timings and if I'd seen that before I wouldn't have posted > this. Ah, I forgot about that conclusion, i.e. while this does look the right thing to do, it didn't make much difference in practice. It still is tempting to take it, though :-), if only to stop people sending in the same patch in the future without benchmarking, as long as it does not make it worse. Thanks.