From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DF7202A0 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 01:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbdJ0BFS (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50876 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719AbdJ0BFR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:17 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBFCADC04; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=8Mbm0YRakZjfEQJc83WQf98BGAI=; b=UHo2HM aEuGOgxholThxK+39OdexgyrqGRB5rO1wcYP4IPzvKNFAoZeY75pr6bgpuN63KcU tRZiUrlBuwwk9v7lW2cH3z23Pq7vGM0JxWGuCWwrk+M/leDySBP8kvVsYVjvyhtj uvp9O+r74cvIf9BG17PUc9yPBUhqsUmPCChBk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kxaFzzBRdU1KH5eEVNoYFOhAX0ZmM16Q 71ocDgKCoegEhDDxSFTUcr2Q8CX6rxtPuUUY/Q4BH1b3jmUDuGA2cRa2J/huamRh bP9hd0VgfwGmPhgEqH286vUi4TKKb9qpRfvSsDDXrwqYr9CxA5BDMkvpJJV//5jP 3xttO+RhwdM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A71ADC03; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2613DADBFE; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:05:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Ross Kabus Cc: git , Jonathan Nieder , Johannes Sixt , Lars Schneider , Johannes Schindelin , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B6gershausen?= , Jeff King Subject: Re: Consequences of CRLF in index? References: <5e962f69-f9cb-bd7e-481f-050e6239813f@kdbg.org> <30ED36AB-FAB1-4635-94AF-FCEC6F02CE01@gmail.com> <7a4396e8-7b97-9ec9-d028-c5ad29042c86@kdbg.org> <20171026203046.fu3z5ngnw7hckfrn@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:05:15 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Ross Kabus's message of "Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:27:26 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E4B8F886-BAB2-11E7-BE8B-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ross Kabus writes: > Is "* -text" in any way different than "-text" (without the * asterisk)? All > of my .gitattributes files have "-text" (no * asterisk) and I haven't noticed > any difference but could I be missing something subtle? > > ~Ross A line in the .gitattibute file is of the form ... i.e. a pattern to match paths, with a list of attribute definitions. The asterisk they are showing in their description is the part, i.e. "apply the '-text' thing to paths that match '*'", which is equivalent to saying "set text attribute to false for all paths".