From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] worktree: new repo extension to manage worktree behaviors Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:42:49 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1451186079-6119-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <1453808685-21235-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <1453808685-21235-2-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <20160130142039.GB4978@wheezy.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , git@vger.kernel.org, git@drmicha.warpmail.net, Jens.Lehmann@web.de To: Max Kirillov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 31 17:43:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aPv5c-0007os-GZ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:43:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757243AbcAaQm6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:42:58 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:51219 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750854AbcAaQm5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:42:57 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F453EFAC; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:42:51 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Z2+kZdIiXL59sSP2s8hZZvE7Lqw=; b=Cp3fZ+ LVXPOoOYnAD7r1Q09hb6jJrG2pWnx1ECRt0U0Mo6eOn+z4Tkvnv3yj5xTOaWR2Iv Qs2+XDVowUt3IAbgE/HZRzE7k8dwp622MG+OHLmUX+h88zIWrTgRJWSnN7tsolT+ AawOstWBQlN2TWFcZMoMfNeJjBNhUd+Akqv2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=pKngS+D77KHaTr4owSJ1AOHeflfXNDMi +1Ba16chNWRePe+rKScaJiiVPxRX9/a7QYMmx5uGIRq1MTbmKftI6ITUwHVvr2fl M8wgGC3KOm5ZjrJghnSPL1hlN4zQLbv9MCHutY2zORzU1j7Z6ZY/P5kJzxLJfL/4 t6ZC9vu7pSc= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8665F3EFAB; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:42:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [216.239.45.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C10A3EFA6; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:42:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20160130142039.GB4978@wheezy.local> (Max Kirillov's message of "Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:20:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AAE71A2E-C839-11E5-A963-04C16BB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Max Kirillov writes: > The worktree feature has been used by several people > already (me included), and do far the only issue which > requires change in repository layout is the config > separation. Isn't it enough to be confident? One lessor key phrase above is "so far", I think, and another one you forgot to use is s/which requires/that we know &/, which to me is a more serious one. IOW, I do think it is premature for us to say that that config split issue is the only thing, or to say that the issue is best solved by changing the layout in the way being discussed; the multiple-worktree feature needs more lab experience for us to gain confidence.