From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] remote: return non-const pointer from error_buf()
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:28:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqikcx3z5x.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aW3QVkpPPHjKVNLC@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:33:58 +0100")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> This function signature is indeed quite misleading, and I'd argue that
> it continues to be so even after the change. I guess the intent is to
> make it a bit easier to print an error in functions that return a
> string.
>
> I'm not really a huge fan of this, but it's not a fault of this patch
> series, so let's read on.
I concur. "If they do not return any useful value, they should be
void" was my first reaction, but presumably just like "return
error("message");" is a handy way to give message while signalling
an error to the caller, these are used to return NULL that signals
an error? I do not offhand think of a good longer-term direction to
improve this one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 5:18 [PATCH 0/4] memory leaks in remote.c Jeff King
2026-01-19 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] remote: return non-const pointer from error_buf() Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-20 0:28 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-01-20 19:38 ` Jeff King
2026-01-20 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-19 5:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] remote: drop const return of tracking_for_push_dest() Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-19 5:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] remote: fix leak in branch_get_push_1() with invalid "simple" config Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-19 5:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] remote: always allocate branch.push_tracking_ref Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-19 15:04 ` Triangular workflow Harald Nordgren
2026-01-20 19:40 ` Jeff King
2026-01-20 0:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] memory leaks in remote.c Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqikcx3z5x.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox