From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855D8226CF6 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 17:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754327667; cv=none; b=KRHOkArUDe4aCPazA09sBfwsev6zQqHoPwwD/7QEAo79wrCRfglgtQb9/sUeVI/9v1HEFmdE3oALhgp/6R6VrbFSPxwfSJFk7gKyy14ha0USRx6/hU26G+IpoZighbYp3eicOfU0pZncO2ZT7LsV9Xn2NbFx45sxd7uW+t9632Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754327667; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GqBxF8mL1vGW6hSbjczMmAALavXy9lHr2j6mmvj84ZM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hafP0M8iW9saVrj8yXDv/q8VaFRk1GOWAAytesfPwaJajaGqyg/FUvDexFbt1w3NOmcedD+zFzxnepKJ0Q/3y7oMiisMs6uDdrv8t4yiTJcW0u27lYUaTOKfxBfav9UY9+1x/TuQm2Ootz/tZvyfJTlRI8o0yB0gLX8XUEFNZ84= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=MvotMKGw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=OJb0mJFI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="MvotMKGw"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="OJb0mJFI" Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.phl.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A743B140018D; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:14:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:14:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1754327664; x=1754414064; bh=B9IilIUMPm 45MDtpLlstOUKdzR4zICNbWHe+feK16CQ=; b=MvotMKGwcW3JhrbmBDE6Hh+Cpr IKHnX5MWWceSqWIBqXFQ/Om6tf867hUpgZIXxy97GaF/JzZbAWiueJnVi+bBfuPD UY4rMFMgIYYYcDscrCpncESLdGBRth8VOMiRaBjHku3hZT0n7K30mLmTTrxsj6Db l4BOd/+HO7y3tt22fJ4VtX8zQg3ccnHn1oj2YZa7ykTEb9LEhkackSr35HaI/Ai+ iNra8jUg9nOXhulNo2uY2zfiv0W1px64hxSR/KSwMj+D4PKkr5XdGAcDsAf7yOr5 CEOiY7493WDtEEwq+gbT43YPshg6QEtPiVbeyo8QXGU+QDQV6FXuQ+c5Xe0g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1754327664; x=1754414064; bh=B9IilIUMPm45MDtpLlstOUKdzR4zICNbWHe +feK16CQ=; b=OJb0mJFI7OsWeZ7y+PpoqzumVjHU/TSTL1duJFNjgzWvmCtY/09 p9UeRl+ih776V+gT22bOIn3i4HynZeF+Fcv8H/PUYRtUnGPNoMdj5GidVsrHKgzd j334JI3BI+f5yV0SZTaYjWzuWnENv9Hqr2b5habVE7Ungt83l3BEczAoq02D97By 5E83Y6+Q1A29u4KEs8brJ86y7atvpk4wjeoLce6tbfxRo97Xc1D3CF299ZSBQRQg eR8AlvP4ydnMbrj9c97UHGZVjDrHHpAq+jcg+m36uFTY6eXbbzgL4GeVB+oHW/j/ 1TYdSkvMJPxNlWYzUVwULjugH/ytMWMOaCw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdduuddvkeeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddtpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepthhooh hnsehiohhttghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdr ohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehkrhhishhtohhffhgvrhhhrghughhssggrkhhksehfrghsth hmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmvgesthhtrgihlhhorhhrrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtohepshhtohhlvggvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheptghhrhhishhtih grnhdrtghouhguvghrsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvghf fhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopegrvhgrrhgrsgesghhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:14:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: Toon Claes , git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk , Taylor Blau , Derrick Stolee , Christian Couder , Jeff King , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2?= =?utf-8?B?YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] last-modified: new subcommand to show when files were last modified In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 4 Aug 2025 08:34:02 +0200") References: <20250716133206.1787549-1-toon@iotcl.com> <20250730175510.987383-2-toon@iotcl.com> <87ms8jui3p.fsf@iotcl.com> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 10:14:22 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 10:09:41AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Toon Claes writes: >> >> >>> +-t:: >> >> >> >> -t, --tree-in-recursive:: >> > >> > Sure! >> >> Clarify *what* you do to trees in recursive by giving a verb, e.g. >> >> --show-trees-in-recursive > > Ah, that's even better indeed! One question that this raises is whether > this option then should continue to imply `--recursive`. I think it > rather shouldn't with this new wording, but don't feel overly strong > about it. I am somewhat indifferent. We can call the option --show-trees, which I suspect would make it more consistent with ls-trees, while making it a bit more confusing at the same time. I dunno.