From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A341B335A5 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728076655; cv=none; b=agNBpT1kZ3rffArked5/lrByThtEn6Ssq1/6zcwU+xMTp1aAtkNI8PCr/lIP1svXyXjeN7VBy1BCUAluMnn9hIg0rMaA/wUu3/K1cPYDZnkJbGnYgd5l3d2ZGZLqcX7qSQOwM2myPoRUosX4/e+gr0DNgYJuKMetQD3IdCd+9YQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728076655; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VQGrwOdvl3j1mHJTk48/3T3huMILrwYdAJ05Um3J2KE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YqwmFQKQSXby+qQkyc6Hg8RgOzDkpg+CVKn6RSNG6rfJ022/qkep493rqgFEqMsEwIv2ixXcTAymXKsGTz+Vdy6Ys9YQpaIeLv268v61aiOkEGlW8NYNK1Jfz0HZaMxYMFMNxJcoVTZAIS5ms8zxleBkaOygmSKjPOj+pFWZFzU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=RLK3wrjs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=fTFp9x49; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="RLK3wrjs"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="fTFp9x49" Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.phl.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E13A13802C5; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 17:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Oct 2024 17:17:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1728076652; x=1728163052; bh=Z5syOKA/f9 ItA8IxffIKWBKkhYbg9cw2yOKNbLmCGgA=; b=RLK3wrjsvCrHqBVt+r9H1vzfGT ZLmZCCll6bD7oUJq5ksWfR+ND08d31X9m34YrZpH/+WLkJdC369arhTMEeSI96aE gaQlJfryy/JLh+TtVqYBA8byLvZOJRL4aLC/E7/ViBd7rWUEyL8D+v688hwxjMMi E6ONhERHcDDbvkSt9J1qk7djPaQ/eYNZOU1RVQD/7duX6Wn6jiBfVhiT4y4SfPxy I4i5DulhB9SDd73ae9MElAZXf6+SbQno89/ivZTr5CvZLQE3eQvcFSC5QwXvvuWz DhzCcJxCtYbHUUJCkF5qs8vedAH6KvM61euOqgiIr6MaZt//xdY99MSr9tdg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1728076652; x=1728163052; bh=Z5syOKA/f9ItA8IxffIKWBKkhYbg 9cw2yOKNbLmCGgA=; b=fTFp9x49IgdjdgSDCgvIg0GGZl6fJpzAQqfHTcEjGgLl NTshKiy1Gbw23uKZRmRJCFc7c/qj7pU3eKocVP8xt7ztRY6C6Zmgg2S6AG+PXyO1 aIphhDRcdZFwfRMYa5Hb77qXnH2Iv+ksz76CHfaSpjmTEXSIgpETLePAYu7+dEdc pEJrcXGABuTMMnwQ2BEGxcgNSgsaXSv28CtpanhI6Ns0vHkEdssmiwGcEoDvO0Sz R/LPXiLkwKjVMijCehxWhE3azJ0crIIk/vUTgMyXSCe+AyRys0ZfONQMlM0+w/mu BxeFFhBhMRJ8sIg6nv6wJCFX60XoXUaaCsDBxP+k1w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvddvfedgudehlecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredt necuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsoh igrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffieetueejveefheduvdejudffieejgeef hfdtvdekfeejjeehtdegfefgieejtdenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhs thgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddtpdhmohguvgepshhmth hpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtghhithhgrggughgvthesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdp rhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjh hohhgrnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinhesghhmgidruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepphgv fhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epmhgvsehtthgrhihlohhrrhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhnhgtrghikeeisehg mhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtg hpthhtohepshhtohhlvggvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 17:17:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, peff@peff.net, ps@pks.im, me@ttaylorr.com, johncai86@gmail.com, newren@gmail.com, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] pack-objects: create new name-hash algorithm In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:46:15 +0000") References: Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 14:17:30 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: > I've been focused recently on understanding and mitigating the growth of a > few internal repositories. Some of these are growing much larger than > expected for the number of contributors, and there are multiple aspects to > why this growth is so large. > ... > Derrick Stolee (6): > pack-objects: add --full-name-hash option > repack: test --full-name-hash option > pack-objects: add GIT_TEST_FULL_NAME_HASH > git-repack: update usage to match docs > p5313: add size comparison test > test-tool: add helper for name-hash values Recent CI jobs on 'seen' has been failing the leak-check jobs, e.g. https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/11184876759/job/31096601111#step:4:1886 shows that t5310 and t5334 are having problems. I randomly picked this topic and ejected it out of 'seen', and the result is fairing a bit better. t5310 that failed 228/228 subtests in the above run is now passing. I didn't run this topic alone under the leak checker, so it is entirely possible that there are some unfortunate interactions with other topics in flight. t5334 still fails 8/16 subtests just like the above run, exonerating this topic for its breakage. https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/11186737635/job/31102378478#step:4:1880