git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	 Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-patch: handle splitting hunks with diff.suppressBlankEmpty
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:29:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqikx2wtn4.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1763.git.1721312619822.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:23:39 +0000")

"Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> When "add -p" parses diffs, it looks for context lines starting with a
> single space. But when diff.suppressBlankEmpty is in effect, an empty
> context line will omit the space, giving us a true empty line. This
> confuses the parser, which is unable to split based on such a line.
>
> It's tempting to say that we should just make sure that we generate a
> diff without that option.  However, although we do not parse hunks that
> the user has manually edited with parse_diff() we do allow the user
> to split such hunks. As POSIX calls the decision of whether to print the
> space here "implementation-defined" we need to handle edited hunks where
> empty context lines omit the space.
>
> So let's handle both cases: a context line either starts with a space or
> consists of a totally empty line by normalizing the first character to a
> space when we parse them. Normalizing the first character rather than
> changing the code to check for a space or newline will hopefully future
> proof against introducing similar bugs if the code is changed.
>
> Reported-by: Ilya Tumaykin <itumaykin@gmail.com>
> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---

Well written.  Thanks for a pleasant read.

> @@ -953,7 +960,7 @@ static int split_hunk(struct add_p_state *s, struct file_diff *file_diff,
>  	context_line_count = 0;
>  
>  	while (splittable_into > 1) {
> -		ch = s->plain.buf[current];
> +		ch = normalize_marker(s->plain.buf + current);

I wondered if &s->plain.buf[current] is easier to grok, but what's
written already is good enough ;-)

There is another explicit mention of ' ' in merge_hunks().  Unless
we are normalizing the buffer here (which I do not think we do),
wouldn't we have to make sure that the code over there also knows
that an empty line in a patch is an unmodified empty line?

                if (plain[overlap_end] != ' ')
                        return error(_("expected context line "
                                       "#%d in\n%.*s"),


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-18 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-18 14:23 [PATCH] add-patch: handle splitting hunks with diff.suppressBlankEmpty Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-07-18 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-07-19 15:17   ` Phillip Wood
2024-07-20 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-07-20 16:01   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-07-20 16:02   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] add-patch: use normalize_marker() when recounting edited hunk Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqikx2wtn4.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).