From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Various fixes for v2.45.1 and friends
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 22:33:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqikz7d90g.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqseycca0z.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 20 May 2024 16:56:44 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> In any case, I just compared the result of applying these patches to
> v2.39.4 with the result of reverting the following out of v2.39.4:
>
> 584de0b4 (Add a helper function to compare file contents, 2024-03-30)
> 8db1e874 (clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone, 2024-03-28)
> 20f3588e (core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning, 2024-03-30)
>
> and the differences was exactly as I expected. A Makefile fix and a
> new test added to t1350 are the extra in the series, but otherwise
> the patches are essentially reversion of these three steps. Very
> nicely done.
>
> Thanks for a quick turnaround. Will take further look.
I completed merge-up exercise and compared the result with your
"tentative" cascade from maint-2.39 to maint-2.45 tracks.
The differences came from pointed cherry-picks (like 'ci: avoid bare
"gcc" for osx-gcc job') looked minimal and sensible. I wonder what
the best way to do a public review of this kind of history, though.
$ git log --oneline --graph maint-2.45..dscho/tentative/maint-2.45
* aeddcb0275 Git 2.45.2
* 65f0d62523 Sync with 2.44.2
* 9953011fcd Git 2.44.2
* f78818b645 Sync with 2.43.5
* 0aeca2f80b Git 2.43.5
* 0cc3782b1a Sync with 2.42.3
* 33efa2ad1a Git 2.42.3
* 30195eb2b6 Sync with 2.41.2
* 5215e4e368 Git 2.41.2
* 9d6788fd73 Sync with 2.40.3
* 4bf5d57da6 Git 2.40.3
* 9f7a956be5 Sync with 2.39.5
* b9a96c4e5d Git 2.39.5
All of the above (and the one below) are merging up, resolving
conflicts, and updating release notes and GIT-VERSION-GEN.
* b674c6f66c Merge branch 'js/fix-v2.39.4-regressions' into maint-2.39
|\
| * 5c576e889d Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents"
| * 0044a35567 clone: drop the protections where hooks aren't run
| * cd14042b06 tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again
| * 57db89a149 Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning"
| * 961dfc35f4 init: use the correct path of the templates directory again
| * d4a003bf2c hook: plug a new memory leak
The above 6 patches all appeared on the list in this "v3" thread.
* 883ca51e0a Merge branch 'jk/ci-macos-gcc13-fix' into 'maint-2.39'
This is a merge of the following three patches to maint-2.39
* d4543be3f2 ci: stop installing "gcc-13" for osx-gcc
* 2aef8020d2 ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job
* f3e5bdfebc ci: drop mention of BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES variable
These three patches were taken from jk/ci-macos-gcc13-fix that was
forked from v2.45.0 and rebased them on top of v2.39.4. The bottom
one seems to have been adjusted for the older contexts, which during
subsequent merging-up has been adjusted back again for the more
recent contexts (e.g., we used to use $HOME/bin but use $P4_PATH for
Perforce these days, and such differences in the base version appear
in the context for "BREW_INSTALL_PACKAGES" change).
So, in short, I didn't see anything unexpected to see in these
branches. The "ci" fixes were already reviewed elsewhere (even
though there are slight deviations), so if people are OK with the 6
patches in this thread, I would say we are good to go.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 23:15 [PATCH 0/8] Various fixes for v2.45.1 and friends Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] hook: plug a new memory leak Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] init: use the correct path of the templates directory again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 0:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-18 18:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] hook(clone protections): add escape hatch Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] hooks(clone protections): special-case current Git LFS hooks Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 0:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] hooks(clone protections): simplify templates hooks validation Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 23:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 23:52 ` [PATCH 0/8] Various fixes for v2.45.1 and friends Junio C Hamano
2024-05-18 0:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] hook: plug a new memory leak Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] init: use the correct path of the templates directory again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] hook(clone protections): add escape hatch Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 18:14 ` Jeff King
2024-05-18 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-18 19:35 ` Jeff King
2024-05-18 19:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-18 19:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-18 19:47 ` Jeff King
2024-05-18 20:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-18 21:12 ` Jeff King
2024-05-19 1:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-20 16:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-20 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-20 19:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-20 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-20 21:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] hooks(clone protections): special-case current Git LFS hooks Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] hooks(clone protections): simplify templates hooks validation Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-18 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Various fixes for v2.45.1 and friends Junio C Hamano
2024-05-18 19:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-18 20:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2024-05-20 20:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] hook: plug a new memory leak Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] init: use the correct path of the templates directory again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] Revert "core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] tests: verify that `clone -c core.hooksPath=/dev/null` works again Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] clone: drop the protections where hooks aren't run Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Revert "Add a helper function to compare file contents" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-20 23:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Various fixes for v2.45.1 and friends Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 5:33 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-21 18:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 22:33 ` brian m. carlson
2024-05-21 22:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqikz7d90g.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).