From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="T2G56v6p" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9182190 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:11:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C321C98BD; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 18:11:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=D1m63k0P5khrLhsRRDqfsQ/Tq5qi0jj70InqnM GcxbA=; b=T2G56v6pX8ot4J/Xu3k3oZYtAuemgJ80xtve7VP2I4fsQHxXogeVF5 d3wHZZ60y1fsdxwsZRXYwNzWya2+5zmHY1IeWQ2dKsq09dCFxXj0LUHtb5254dMd lAXVD1jFG54x61kKElJR0HXKFiboyS7vH/vaRWA5ksJcXEUv907fY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA8A1C98BC; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 18:11:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.103.223]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EF261C98BB; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 18:11:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] builtin/clone: fix bundle URIs with mismatching object formats In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:40:01 +0100") References: Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 08:11:16 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 174BB858-961F-11EE-83C0-25B3960A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: > This is not a problem in the context of the files backend ... > It will become a problem though once > we land the reftable backend, which indeed does require to know about > the proper object format at the time of creation. OK. That answers the question I had on the previous step. Thanks.