From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48F5C433DB for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBBC64E7D for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230133AbhBPTqO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:46:14 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:59089 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229991AbhBPTqN (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:46:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DCD117784; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:45:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XIuSqTeXmG1el/swyrEBPdeTmo8=; b=PMuFou qKsPg49jtCHMQTOLEUQ6w7eDjHBy8A5prp46ogJoz/MliqDqe5txe72NUAD19EjQ htPRUGV8c2uxCTiC774LRoHtV1Ds41NAynZN9UBTnzpbmZp3br81gKJJJzBCYqyv 8Oa+NzkotzdYLvNCQ5iydr3et9fzHkMK3ZbT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=cOkzxAK+XOy0mSOa0atiZWJ5sHvt2+qz EuK/Q/Rr4qvhOum1yLPcRylazQuwULBKNUJN12R+ljB2DoFvx60kFkRMTZ7DrFJA at57XUtLxhoajnPGOifq8K04WSl5etfBdLSIt6p4SPz4DXdmyolLuf0s7v1us5i/ dQRb9wY5aS4= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F475117783; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:45:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.243.138.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6720D11777F; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:45:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Rafael Silva , git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] blame: remove unnecessary use of get_commit_info() References: <20210216163151.76307-1-rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:45:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:35:16 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 85EB7AC2-708F-11EB-9859-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > ... > This is a good way to demonstrate the change. Definitely worthwhile for > demonstrating the value of the patch. I'll second Taylor's request that > this performance data goes in the commit message so we can see the details > in the future. Thanks, all. I do agree with you and Taylor that these numbers deserve to be in the log message, not cover letter.