From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4586BC433E0 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17271230FC for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725844AbgLUSCc (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:02:32 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52865 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725785AbgLUSCb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:02:31 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D635AE470; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:01:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=g9LtDTeWH6Z6QHDKVYyuwQB6OyA=; b=etYzeo WuYLYFozmjYV3lcor3MIVVby//DPfI+g+ZoH33fTdxJ+MYbSjnvyAracvcpuguPO oCxhaCKET52fLGNEwyD8hD4DqIYl5+MUMXRgVcnmiDZBuagrVTrDC5/0xLAwN8Cp WhJxtZTxnpALud32hoqo1Uln7DeexQSK2ZLAs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=imrqCRD1WeBkuIEoJpSeh9Lg8wna0O6V VU2LxmSyIyGdOeWL8e7FgZv7m6EZg2jXTUTORYkYm9W9seoVZm6TEGUV1+/1Aemx j+w3kwi0yym3Qo5DGj2keIfcXy7mtKKfRwxSL/kQ+TaMp3YKKGBWQ5+7NIk+HeHq fBaNqfe3GrA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54952AE46F; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:01:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6B9AAE46E; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:01:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Han-Wen Nienhuys Cc: git Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2020, #03; Fri, 18) References: Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:01:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:40:03 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 98A49C6C-43B6-11EB-8571-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 6:36 AM Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * hn/reftable (2020-12-09) 15 commits >> . Add "test-tool dump-reftable" command. >> . git-prompt: prepare for reftable refs backend >> . Reftable support for git-core >> . reftable: rest of library >> . reftable: reftable file level tests >> . reftable: read reftable files >> . reftable: write reftable files >> . reftable: a generic binary tree implementation >> . reftable: reading/writing blocks >> . reftable: (de)serialization for the polymorphic record type. >> . reftable: add blocksource, an abstraction for random access reads >> . reftable: utility functions >> . reftable: add error related functionality >> . reftable: add LICENSE >> . init-db: set the_repository->hash_algo early on >> >> The "reftable" backend for the refs API. >> >> Ejected for now, as it has been breaking the tip of 'seen' for too >> long. > > > Can you provide more information here? The PR at > https://github.com/git/git/pull/847 passes all tests (except for the > VSBuild, with errors that seem unrelated.) Sorry, but it has been a long time that I have no more detail than the above handy. Older CI history might know more, but I have no time to dig that right now (and I'd be just as efficient as you would for doing such things). I can try including it in one of the today's pushout of 'seen' and see what breaks, which would be the easiest ;-) Thanks for pinging.