From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5059F20756 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756451AbdAJXFE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:05:04 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50923 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750872AbdAJXFD (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:05:03 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AA65F145; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:05:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Wl+Zp23qEKQ6SJYu7W11/asVrCE=; b=Ti2QTG fE7pOXz7ctHWJBOkQTbUf9aCnr8o7on8Bn3DbpjoJjbYCgK9diyRu0SJ0dUEO+wO MP7BoeImjnNASDvOsRIzsILBmsZ/mXk2LwK4xj9AAAiIk7JbUi68JGU01Hlpcnl1 TLgGqmZr9Qm6GbY/V2kX6hAPARVHshyJnEgHY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rf84V35FeWPCPlzBxtGS1tIJ2yw5uNRB n6Bn8/MFoPNlI+sq8YdGoBq5sP3gWER/Ohmm8+MvBObo5DTkEwX96Oz+SLVHD0x+ Pjc5GGy9oRU2NPI0vW37VBQmtEUdmv4B9venVL2T3i2+JT8P33vWu7b2AzxMg38i JsdelE56LLY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5035F142; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:05:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEBDF5F141; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:05:00 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?66eI64iE7JeY?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asciidoctor: fix user-manual to be built by `asciidoctor` References: <3c160f81a88cf8697f2459bb7f2a3e27fb3e469c.1483373021.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <20170104080852.bmlmtzxhjx4qt74f@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170108032709.k43zmej5lxmcoj4o@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:04:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20170108032709.k43zmej5lxmcoj4o@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sat, 7 Jan 2017 22:27:09 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 36913294-D789-11E6-BC5F-A7617B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 02:03:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Is that a longer way to say that the claim "... is designed as a >> book" is false? >> >> > So I dunno. I really do think "article" is conceptually the most >> > appropriate style, but I agree that there are some book-like things >> > (like appendices). >> >> ... Yeah, I should have read forward first before starting to insert >> my comments. > > To be honest, I'm not sure whether "book" versus "article" was really > considered in the original writing. I think we can call it whichever > produces the output we find most pleasing. I was mostly just pointing at > there are some tradeoffs in the end result in flipping the type. I understand. And I tend to agree that the silliness you observed (like a t-o-c for a one-section "chapter") is not quite welcome. For now I queued only 2/2 which looked good. I won't object if somebody else rerolls 1/2 to appease AsciiDoctor, but let's take an obviously good bit first. Thanks.