Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
	 Abhijeetsingh Meena <abhijeet040403@gmail.com>,
	Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
	 Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>,
	 Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] blame: harden ignore-revs parser and tag peeling
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:07:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjynrwjg0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e12486c0d5dd8b94393b08413a85a8d47f86edd.1791493644.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:07:23 +0000")

"Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> - In oidset_parse_file_carefully(), strbuf_getline() reads up to the
>   next newline and records the full line length in sb.len, including
>   any embedded NUL bytes. However, strchr(sb.buf, '#') and
>   parse_oid_hex_algop(sb.buf, &oid, &p, algop) treat sb.buf as a
>   NUL-terminated string. If a line contains an embedded NUL byte after
>   a valid object name (such as "<oid>\0garbage" or "<oid>\0# comment"),
>   *p is '\0' and trailing bytes on the line are silently ignored.
>   Reject any line containing an embedded NUL byte via memchr() before
>   stripping comments and whitespace.

Maybe I am slow, but I do not immediately see why ignoring
everything after the first NUL is a problem.  A call to
strbuf_trim() is ineffective at trimming whitespace that appears
immediately before such a NUL.  For example, while

    cf9bdb1...f6092d # comment LF

would feed the leading 'cf9bdb1...f6092d' part (after stripping
whitespace before '#') to parse_oid_hex_algop(), this

    cf9bdb1...f6092d NUL comment LF

would keep the whitespace after '92d' and cause the parsing to
fail.  I do not see any security implications here.

On the other hand ...

> - In peel_to_commit_oid(), odb_read_object_info() is called without
>   OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT or OBJECT_INFO_QUICK, and deref_tag()
>   calls parse_object() on tag targets without checking whether the
>   target object exists locally first. In a partial clone, any missing
>   commit OID or tag target listed in the ignore-revs file would trigger
>   lazy promisor fetches and pack directory rescans during git-blame(1).
>   Use odb_read_object_info_extended() with OBJECT_INFO_LOOKUP_REPLACE |
>   OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT | OBJECT_INFO_QUICK and peel OBJ_TAG
>   objects one layer per iteration, verifying that each target object
>   exists locally and matches the tag's declared type before parsing it.

... this may be a very reasonable thing to do, I would think.  In a
shallow clone, if we are not auto-deepening the shallow boundary
during a "git blame" session, we have no reason to lazy fetch
entries in the ignore file that are older than the shallow boundary.

> diff --git a/oidset.c b/oidset.c
> index c8ff0b385c..90d39204d3 100644
> --- a/oidset.c
> +++ b/oidset.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ void oidset_parse_file_carefully(struct oidset *set, const char *path,
>  		const char *p;
>  		const char *name;
>  
> +		if (memchr(sb.buf, '\0', sb.len))
> +			die("invalid object name: %s", sb.buf);

A file with such an entry is rejected and the entire operation is
aborted as suspected attack attempt, which feels like striking the
balance between usability and security at a wrong place.

But a line with broken object name already is rejected with "die()"
with the existing code, so it may be OK.

> diff --git a/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh b/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh
> index cace00ae8d..70fe509a64 100755
> --- a/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh
> +++ b/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh
> @@ -327,4 +327,42 @@ test_expect_success ignore_merge '
>  	test_cmp expect actual
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success 'ignore-revs-file rejects lines with embedded NUL bytes' '
> +	rev_b=$(git rev-parse B) &&
> +	printf "%sQgarbage\n" "$rev_b" | q_to_nul >ignore_nul &&
> +	test_must_fail git blame file --ignore-revs-file ignore_nul 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "invalid object name:" err &&
> +
> +	printf "%sQ# comment\n" "$rev_b" | q_to_nul >ignore_nul_comment &&
> +	test_must_fail git blame file --ignore-revs-file ignore_nul_comment 2>err &&
> +	test_grep "invalid object name:" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'ignore-revs-file peels chained tags and skips missing tag targets' '
> +	test_write_lines BB L2-modified L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 CC >file &&
> +	git add file &&
> +	test_tick &&
> +	git commit -m D &&
> +	git tag -a -m "tag 1" D_TAG1 HEAD &&
> +	git tag -a -m "tag 2" D_TAG2 D_TAG1 &&
> +	git rev-parse D_TAG2 >ignore_tag_chain &&
> +	git blame --line-porcelain file --ignore-revs-file ignore_tag_chain >blame_raw &&
> +	sed -ne "/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]* [0-9][0-9]* 2/s/ .*//p" blame_raw >actual &&
> +	git rev-parse A >expect &&
> +	test_cmp expect actual &&
> +
> +	test_config extensions.partialClone origin &&
> +	test_config remote.origin.promisor true &&
> +	test_config remote.origin.url /nonexistent &&
> +	missing_oid=$(test_oid deadbeef) &&
> +	bad_tag=$(printf "object %s\ntype commit\ntag bad-tag\ntagger T <t@example.com> 0 +0000\n\nmsg\n" "$missing_oid" |
> +		git hash-object -t tag -w --stdin) &&
> +	test_write_lines "$missing_oid" "$bad_tag" >ignore_bad_tag &&
> +	git blame --line-porcelain file --ignore-revs-file ignore_bad_tag >blame_raw 2>err &&
> +	test_must_be_empty err &&
> +	sed -ne "/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]* [0-9][0-9]* 2/s/ .*//p" blame_raw >actual &&
> +	git rev-parse HEAD >expect &&
> +	test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
>  test_done

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 23:29 [PATCH] blame: default to ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-09-30 14:59 ` Ravi Mistry
2026-10-05 15:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-05 21:12   ` Ravi Mistry
2026-10-07 17:43     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-07 18:07       ` Ravi Mistry
2026-10-08 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] blame: ignore revs in HEAD:.git-blame-ignore-revs by default Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-10-08 21:07   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] blame: harden ignore-revs parser and tag peeling Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-10-09  5:07     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-08 21:07   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] blame: ignore revs in HEAD:.git-blame-ignore-revs Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-10-09 20:17     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-10  6:12       ` Eric Sunshine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqjynrwjg0.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=abhijeet040403@gmail.com \
    --cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=rmistry@google.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox