From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Abhijeetsingh Meena <abhijeet040403@gmail.com>,
Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] blame: harden ignore-revs parser and tag peeling
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:07:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjynrwjg0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e12486c0d5dd8b94393b08413a85a8d47f86edd.1791493644.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:07:23 +0000")
"Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> - In oidset_parse_file_carefully(), strbuf_getline() reads up to the
> next newline and records the full line length in sb.len, including
> any embedded NUL bytes. However, strchr(sb.buf, '#') and
> parse_oid_hex_algop(sb.buf, &oid, &p, algop) treat sb.buf as a
> NUL-terminated string. If a line contains an embedded NUL byte after
> a valid object name (such as "<oid>\0garbage" or "<oid>\0# comment"),
> *p is '\0' and trailing bytes on the line are silently ignored.
> Reject any line containing an embedded NUL byte via memchr() before
> stripping comments and whitespace.
Maybe I am slow, but I do not immediately see why ignoring
everything after the first NUL is a problem. A call to
strbuf_trim() is ineffective at trimming whitespace that appears
immediately before such a NUL. For example, while
cf9bdb1...f6092d # comment LF
would feed the leading 'cf9bdb1...f6092d' part (after stripping
whitespace before '#') to parse_oid_hex_algop(), this
cf9bdb1...f6092d NUL comment LF
would keep the whitespace after '92d' and cause the parsing to
fail. I do not see any security implications here.
On the other hand ...
> - In peel_to_commit_oid(), odb_read_object_info() is called without
> OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT or OBJECT_INFO_QUICK, and deref_tag()
> calls parse_object() on tag targets without checking whether the
> target object exists locally first. In a partial clone, any missing
> commit OID or tag target listed in the ignore-revs file would trigger
> lazy promisor fetches and pack directory rescans during git-blame(1).
> Use odb_read_object_info_extended() with OBJECT_INFO_LOOKUP_REPLACE |
> OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT | OBJECT_INFO_QUICK and peel OBJ_TAG
> objects one layer per iteration, verifying that each target object
> exists locally and matches the tag's declared type before parsing it.
... this may be a very reasonable thing to do, I would think. In a
shallow clone, if we are not auto-deepening the shallow boundary
during a "git blame" session, we have no reason to lazy fetch
entries in the ignore file that are older than the shallow boundary.
> diff --git a/oidset.c b/oidset.c
> index c8ff0b385c..90d39204d3 100644
> --- a/oidset.c
> +++ b/oidset.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ void oidset_parse_file_carefully(struct oidset *set, const char *path,
> const char *p;
> const char *name;
>
> + if (memchr(sb.buf, '\0', sb.len))
> + die("invalid object name: %s", sb.buf);
A file with such an entry is rejected and the entire operation is
aborted as suspected attack attempt, which feels like striking the
balance between usability and security at a wrong place.
But a line with broken object name already is rejected with "die()"
with the existing code, so it may be OK.
> diff --git a/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh b/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh
> index cace00ae8d..70fe509a64 100755
> --- a/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh
> +++ b/t/t8013-blame-ignore-revs.sh
> @@ -327,4 +327,42 @@ test_expect_success ignore_merge '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'ignore-revs-file rejects lines with embedded NUL bytes' '
> + rev_b=$(git rev-parse B) &&
> + printf "%sQgarbage\n" "$rev_b" | q_to_nul >ignore_nul &&
> + test_must_fail git blame file --ignore-revs-file ignore_nul 2>err &&
> + test_grep "invalid object name:" err &&
> +
> + printf "%sQ# comment\n" "$rev_b" | q_to_nul >ignore_nul_comment &&
> + test_must_fail git blame file --ignore-revs-file ignore_nul_comment 2>err &&
> + test_grep "invalid object name:" err
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'ignore-revs-file peels chained tags and skips missing tag targets' '
> + test_write_lines BB L2-modified L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 CC >file &&
> + git add file &&
> + test_tick &&
> + git commit -m D &&
> + git tag -a -m "tag 1" D_TAG1 HEAD &&
> + git tag -a -m "tag 2" D_TAG2 D_TAG1 &&
> + git rev-parse D_TAG2 >ignore_tag_chain &&
> + git blame --line-porcelain file --ignore-revs-file ignore_tag_chain >blame_raw &&
> + sed -ne "/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]* [0-9][0-9]* 2/s/ .*//p" blame_raw >actual &&
> + git rev-parse A >expect &&
> + test_cmp expect actual &&
> +
> + test_config extensions.partialClone origin &&
> + test_config remote.origin.promisor true &&
> + test_config remote.origin.url /nonexistent &&
> + missing_oid=$(test_oid deadbeef) &&
> + bad_tag=$(printf "object %s\ntype commit\ntag bad-tag\ntagger T <t@example.com> 0 +0000\n\nmsg\n" "$missing_oid" |
> + git hash-object -t tag -w --stdin) &&
> + test_write_lines "$missing_oid" "$bad_tag" >ignore_bad_tag &&
> + git blame --line-porcelain file --ignore-revs-file ignore_bad_tag >blame_raw 2>err &&
> + test_must_be_empty err &&
> + sed -ne "/^[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]* [0-9][0-9]* 2/s/ .*//p" blame_raw >actual &&
> + git rev-parse HEAD >expect &&
> + test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 23:29 [PATCH] blame: default to ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-09-30 14:59 ` Ravi Mistry
2026-10-05 15:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-05 21:12 ` Ravi Mistry
2026-10-07 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-07 18:07 ` Ravi Mistry
2026-10-08 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] blame: ignore revs in HEAD:.git-blame-ignore-revs by default Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-10-08 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] blame: harden ignore-revs parser and tag peeling Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-10-09 5:07 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-08 21:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] blame: ignore revs in HEAD:.git-blame-ignore-revs Ravi Mistry via GitGitGadget
2026-10-09 20:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-10 6:12 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqjynrwjg0.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=abhijeet040403@gmail.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
--cc=rmistry@google.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox