From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2790D215077 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 21:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760047093; cv=none; b=FlLXECiXO2PRSy6PLafEKjCAbbRoVVRFHkH/pY+1uEIoLJeNve4XTIjn9Y70ykaSJcdk9SZLGi9sikiI8PncZrMepasMWZ/dbFB4vcnrRLy6sUwQTQ2hCIJGE3Zjc0BaVxO3Lf5b2vSsByVtm5vA4kkX5bvATvt84WM3CK2oHww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760047093; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8/Om0eXDHFVF4qWjWiEO2N5NbIeOdOeVaW4Utz4KQis=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LUd0d9ohjx2u7OK7D/RkLDklgOs882rksEORImJ88xIup7isCOk8lfY1LHNy+cuD/1hO2PXz+gU+Oq+D2wd9cEKMyrYul4dyLHik11tmRbbKKutcyAYmHkon/0RJ+AhgEz9e8cjWImeOcOgT7fWAXNoAvFbhY+mDoWG5yCD0v88= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=XEwNJcOw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=r01IFhue; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="XEwNJcOw"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="r01IFhue" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449E214000E6; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 17:58:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Oct 2025 17:58:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1760047091; x=1760133491; bh=8/Om0eXDHFVF4qWjWiEO2N5NbIeOdOeVaW4Utz4KQis=; b= XEwNJcOw7U9USHjLyNlXOMNx6MBO19wggGuNVtTI3kf7l1IrQlwaW2sa0JHa3QqQ saNdWyvJPidxEAFv60cvkzh3KHZHVvo3lYFQZ06Pb3yt3APOotSMS5Hra98hBD4J hnJ5XMU9QnpAKi6WFcYqWTpq5yDqXy53rJG3x1kGoYF0gkjKFdDC4bUkEnQbK9Kn SXHM0NuBIFIRg01p9tAFqUx9UVIsDL+kwIJMREw0Sgk4ZqFvbs2DbOe1IZl7lsIU legMAjBBrDtL/o9cTB3hNL0CZUNNhl5iqGA6Qidk5HiKJuMbmks1NCUvlmyts7sw N72+isuwl4udhtyjOwSJFQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1760047091; x= 1760133491; bh=8/Om0eXDHFVF4qWjWiEO2N5NbIeOdOeVaW4Utz4KQis=; b=r 01IFhueFVH1+bfcemNHmGdm62maIZ6RuFZrN2G06Fyal4KD8mZ+w/y7sf4pT+2Io PY1DsFmcJkJ15ieh69yLPMphvXd9WnfGcgPqNQlG6OsEz/5Pc1kMRb08rl9lXgfB /WLPZ7kQ5RfZJNcCYpPmfwEwvG8N6bGaNYDiC4z92uWNiLt953YFLp7gmH8OEmm7 8h4R9y5o6etxnhJsDKI6yo6BjExjsxCqSlCHcykqLB6F5q16xXazG+L2v5Dw+9U8 ZOOfwFdXORy8gjn9P90rvOa4rqCvjMZFwUFzlxXmH26feO5cx67UUjILu61+Ehle SMmFm/8qJYZAekby6tl0A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddutdejfedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtkeertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihho ucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedtffdvteegvddtkeetfeevueevlefgkeefheeigfehveehvdekheelveev fedtheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegtohguvgeskhhhrghughhssggrkhhkrdhnrghmvg dprhgtphhtthhopehkrhhishhtohhffhgvrhhhrghughhssggrkhhksehfrghsthhmrghi lhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehphhhilhhlihhprdifohhougesughunhgvlhhmrdhorh hgrdhukhdprhgtphhtthhopehjiehtsehkuggsghdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihht sehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosg hogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 17:58:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" Cc: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" , "Phillip Wood" , "Johannes Sixt" , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: warn against --committer-date-is-author-date In-Reply-To: <91ddb8c2-ae3a-4b13-a23b-e5cca172ee09@app.fastmail.com> (Kristoffer Haugsbakk's message of "Thu, 09 Oct 2025 22:47:00 +0200") References: <6af09726-e3bf-4903-87ae-9524ad334678@kdbg.org> <3a8dfd13-982d-4c83-b675-1e9a63bb6ab0@gmail.com> <91ddb8c2-ae3a-4b13-a23b-e5cca172ee09@app.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:58:09 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" writes: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025, at 16:31, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote: >>> We should maybe think about deprecating it for "git rebase" though as it >>> is a lot less clear that it is sensible there. If you're rebasing a >>> branch then there is a very high likely hood that the upstream committer >>> dates of the commits the branch is being rebased onto will be newer that >>> the author dates of the commits in your branch. >> >> That makes sense. If there is no use case then it should be deprecated. >> >> I could mark it as such in the next version. >> >> Anyone else have an opinion on this? >> > > By the way. I thought of adding a stderr warning when using this option > on git-rebase(1). But I don’t think I’ve seen that used in this program > before. If so, why is that? That’s more in your face than just adding it > to the documentation. > > Is it about people parsing stderr, maybe..? Standard error stream would be buried in other progress things, and it won't be seen if you are "rebase -i" interactive, in which case the first thing you see is a full-screen editor with list of instructions (where we _could_ add new warning text).