From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] bulk-checkin: use repository variable from transaction
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:03:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjz2vxp98.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821232249.319427-5-jltobler@gmail.com> (Justin Tobler's message of "Thu, 21 Aug 2025 18:22:49 -0500")
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:
> The bulk-checkin subsystem depends on `the_repository`. Adapt functions
> and call sites to access the repository through `struct odb_transaction`
> instead. The `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIBALE` is still required as the
> `pack_compression_level` and `pack_size_limit_cfg` globals are still
> used.
Also we grab the details of the new packfile the bulk-checkin
machinery is building out of the transaction, which made some
redundant parameters functions take go away, ...
> -static void finish_tmp_packfile(struct strbuf *basename,
> - const char *pack_tmp_name,
> - struct pack_idx_entry **written_list,
> - uint32_t nr_written,
> - struct pack_idx_option *pack_idx_opts,
> +static void finish_tmp_packfile(struct odb_transaction *transaction,
> + struct strbuf *basename,
> unsigned char hash[])
... like this one. Very nice.
> @@ -117,7 +118,8 @@ static void flush_batch_fsync(struct odb_transaction *transaction)
> * to ensure that the data in each new object file is durable before
> * the final name is visible.
> */
> - strbuf_addf(&temp_path, "%s/bulk_fsync_XXXXXX", repo_get_object_directory(the_repository));
> + strbuf_addf(&temp_path, "%s/bulk_fsync_XXXXXX",
> + transaction->odb->sources->path);
This is doing a lot more than a simple "the_repository" ->
"odb->repo" replacement. How much confidence do we have
that the internal detail of repo_get_object_directory() will stay
the same and our developers in the future would spot that this open
coded copy needs to be updated if they have to change it?
> -static int deflate_blob_to_pack(struct bulk_checkin_packfile *state,
> - struct object_id *result_oid,
> - int fd, size_t size,
> - const char *path, unsigned flags)
> +int index_blob_bulk_checkin(struct odb_transaction *transaction,
> + struct object_id *result_oid,
> + int fd, size_t size,
> + const char *path, unsigned flags)
Ahh, OK, with the simplification to always take transaction, there
is no need to have the deflate_blob_to_pack() function, which had
only one caller, as an internal implementation detail anymore.
This change could have been in the previous step and it would have
been less surprising; the above "Ahh, OK" is my reaction to the
surprise ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 22:55 [PATCH 0/3] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-20 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] bulk-checkin: introduce object database transaction structure Justin Tobler
2025-08-20 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-20 22:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] bulk-checkin: wire repository variable Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 0:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 20:26 ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 0:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] bulk-checkin: introduce object database transaction structure Justin Tobler
2025-08-21 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-22 18:07 ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] bulk-checkin: require transaction for index_blob_bulk_checkin() Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-22 19:13 ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 20:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-21 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] bulk-checkin: use repository variable from transaction Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 17:03 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-08-22 19:38 ` Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] bulk-checkin: introduce object database transaction structure Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] bulk-checkin: require transaction for index_blob_bulk_checkin() Justin Tobler
2025-08-22 21:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] bulk-checkin: use repository variable from transaction Justin Tobler
2025-08-25 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] bulk-checkin: remove global transaction state Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqjz2vxp98.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).