From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A462622D7B1 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749722137; cv=none; b=QlYNd6WDmc3rdVBgrkSb9T1tub24dlOe/ImY/MzlxhDWCjkDHhWgI1rVzJ+5bk2oEwPS791WHdjfeS4sWI40TQj9dk+X2BOkQrbtZfv49NQ0eMMJRrxc/mA1RPL38QxIH7VukT3Z7L/tPwH0SAAoH5E60ACMQbq0M3Bzx2ShPuk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749722137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kCYvlHJUoNNzwtVrLGUt6LNjpfNwF2itsV5S84SNVno=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=stU9LsIggZ7OmB4dqReGuFzzeg3AQViWkr/WvF8Q/rQXfGc9L/2kVcXnqiaN1SJn9PAJHvMKGEQe9/x0FzaM9kJHHhd7ftt5FGIsnYCt9GIfui5oanD9aguwdJiJFG4xcvyq1+VrGMdMimaqY/chLkg3FKby4sEJ/JnHEX4CG1s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=rkCSxJhi; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=UX9+p8X+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="rkCSxJhi"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="UX9+p8X+" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C7911401A7; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 05:55:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Jun 2025 05:55:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1749722133; x=1749808533; bh=lvUujZQSDK C18oYcE/bBnsNQ5BI5ahs6r8zeWf5qvXE=; b=rkCSxJhiAdesKzfxDbp7Qtfl8N 4N0XboIk4QDcgapqioJM1BZ61644ceMJuYNO+3nVGmHcAPD4JjHJioCBiB41buYl hnNu2hjRmRiaTR6w7hg05IWsLfSRBXd+3mk+vCBVVhEPaDnU8Ko+C4XNZDcOysVi 5bCKzsArPHjrLKotiLDRQ8rnd1MMNBQxYx5c6jEwhfkRr7d9cVt4qaonApgcuNFP SYJYNRTwOfq4nrL4s2ig8dqPHGKFBSWYjHu5VPHVcrw2NlXm56CcfwrrPd30M+Hp S4etK6hLtgp/azk7ktKgp7q1thJ0m1Y8oeTsG7boNx0qqVCwQWCOA7I0Tm5w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1749722133; x=1749808533; bh=lvUujZQSDKC18oYcE/bBnsNQ5BI5ahs6r8z eWf5qvXE=; b=UX9+p8X+iRErwePdMjDT/xanXW0lm2SshEiAPyLWFDHVYD8Eo9B PvG4xSLq1EJyQlPgpAjZVsVqywz5tuVLMXiP1v0v+7mAVWew/s9Wd7szoAP7uWMd 24Y2EwJAEbncrfIroJ6krfocaqpdXhyU3qehMkjBEBgpNnnPpfXCXEZUpTk7wtJT pxUCAK5oxNWewRO9t+u0dZJoDxqircxBmOReUacf8IyQAw8p+k01AkiR9mLb8M2I 3pAaX7eKGqk083JtBHYtWQLtZmktdTQQgZ+x7pmcKfpwPSi50MDxcxxJ7Z/Gdmrq j+VUYEK/AbUKZiY1ShhoyfjSNatFmacszkg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugddugeejjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredt necuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsoh igrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueef jeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgt phhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvrghsth grtggthhhiohhtthhisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhgihhtghgr ughgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnh gvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 05:55:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Andrea Stacchiotti Cc: Andrea Stacchiotti via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: move multiple branches in a single --force In-Reply-To: (Andrea Stacchiotti's message of "Thu, 12 Jun 2025 02:19:18 +0200") References: Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 02:55:31 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Andrea Stacchiotti writes: > So, if I may ask, is the proposed patch as written (branch -f A B C X) > acceptable and you just need me to rewrite the commit message > or are you not interested in it at all? As I said, I personally am not interested in such a mode, but you may be able to interest other people in it, and with wider support I may change my mind. But I do not think the feature should not be tied to "--force" option at all. "git branch A B C X" should be able to create three new branches A B C that all tracks X if none of them exist without "--force".