Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] userdiff: extend Bash pattern to cover more shell function forms

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:

> Am 18.02.25 um 20:30 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Moumita <dhar61595@gmail.com> writes:
>>>  	 /* -- */
>>> -	 /* Characters not in the default $IFS value */
>>> -	 "[^ \t]+"),
>> 
>> We used to pretty-much use "a run of non-whitespace characters is a
>> token".  Now we are a bit more picky.
>> 
>> Which may or may not be good, but it is hard to tell if it is an
>> improvement.
>
> It is only a stand-in, because every built-in userdiff driver must have
> a word pattern.

Yeah, I know.  I was merely saying that it was not obvious that the
new pattern, which is way more elaborate, is improvement over that
stand-in pattern.  As these patterns are meant to be applied to only
syntactically valid text, by going more specific pattern from simple
and lenient pattern, we stop recognising some word that we used to
take as a word (i.e. specific patterns need to worry about false
negatives, while simpler patterns only have to avoid egregious false
positives).

> See the old thread here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/373640ea4d95f3b279b9d460d9a8889b4030b4e9.camel@engmark.name/

Yup, 2ff6c346 (userdiff: support Bash, 2020-10-22) is where the
stand-in pattern came from, which is the v3 iteration of that patch.

Thanks.