From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
git@vger.kernel.org, karthik nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
James Liu <james@jamesliu.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:34:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqjzes2s5y.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4lz3begoplgde5iimvk4k7cufiyryntccqo46u3fy5qvqauv3@tta5wfg2ik5t> (Josh Steadmon's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:19:04 -0700")
Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
> On 2024.09.27 00:07, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 07:33:08AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>>
>> > +test_expect_success 'ref transaction: many concurrent writers' '
>> > + test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
>> > + git init repo &&
>> > + (
>> > + cd repo &&
>> > + # Set a high timeout such that a busy CI machine will not abort
>> > + # early. 10 seconds should hopefully be ample of time to make
>> > + # this non-flaky.
>> > + git config set reftable.lockTimeout 10000 &&
>> ...
>
> We're seeing repeated failures from this test case with ASan enabled.
> Unfortunately, we've only been able to reproduce this on our
> $DAYJOB-specific build system. I haven't been able to get it to fail
> using just the upstream Makefile so far. I'll keep trying to find a way
> to reproduce this.
>
> FWIW, we're not getting I/O errors, we see the following:
> fatal: update_ref failed for ref 'refs/heads/branch-20': cannot lock references
>
> We tried increasing the timeout in the test to 2 minutes (up from 10s),
> but it didn't fix the failures.
Thanks for a report, and please keep digging ;-).
Is your build, like Peff's, for Windows, or your variant of Linux?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-01 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 17:46 ` karthik nayak
2024-09-17 17:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-09-18 4:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 18:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes karthik nayak
2024-09-18 4:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:22 ` James Liu
2024-09-18 9:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:26 ` James Liu
2024-09-18 9:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes James Liu
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-19 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-20 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-24 5:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 23:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes James Liu
2024-09-24 5:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:32 ` [PATCH v4 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-27 4:07 ` Jeff King
2024-09-30 6:49 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-30 22:19 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-10-01 4:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-01 22:54 ` Jeff King
2024-10-01 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-10-02 10:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-01 7:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-10-01 18:53 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-10-01 19:08 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqjzes2s5y.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=james@jamesliu.io \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=steadmon@google.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).