From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A5D5F860 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 18:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717524093; cv=none; b=o9XdptQ0dqjAnyBtay331HTPTsUEA4TwVKSzL9ZR8QnbZWQpDhZhKjZ6vALAs5orrIt2vQNeeBhJMUJoIYp1aRqG9faEUCxcBEwtm0n6OsULiDxr5FcGD/uIsn3DExrL8s7EqLLab4JWY3ddKqlyb4Iqlq6p6VM59pITdp0rn5o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717524093; c=relaxed/simple; bh=biLT3W6izCwYKK5oDj1zxoys6KVl0ToA7wFMrjYPT2s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fK5YbBprX0BG2ofkylUlOABTsObzH7fSbuWjBYlnUfLcWkwu8hJvmfifsmrRJzhdGuiRjEyK6Iq5bCXk4dNjomZ0d7B8z8+8xVv2DS+pxXStS5Fn4eLWeWb3R2EWPFM41EISXzUD/5EPm6ZX3s7DR0JP/EyqIH+mRsf/I0Xtcfw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=x/Te8Bh1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="x/Te8Bh1" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65991CCD7; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:01:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=biLT3W6izCwYKK5oDj1zxoys6KVl0ToA7wFMrj YPT2s=; b=x/Te8Bh1Tp+1zZCnr00McbphJPe68klI9s8xWAPvyHYdnehUfRR6nX qrYxp35BhhCpqa7dHGtSmcODz0shnK8MtrOwyWbWXAOdckP/ZVvXZgzNfrQpYlOT ergFD56grAHndLy9bqdbjCeeSykDPYYKFEa9fYzFVRhxvjZ5yw4m8= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3D11CCD4; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:01:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.173.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB8751CCD2; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:01:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Justin Tobler , Dragan Simic , Karthik Nayak , Todd Zullinger Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] docs: document upcoming breaking changes In-Reply-To: (Phillip Wood's message of "Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:23:09 +0100") References: Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 11:01:21 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 73F13B32-229C-11EF-B014-8F8B087618E4-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Phillip Wood writes: > Hi Patrick > > On 04/06/2024 13:32, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> Hi, >> another day, another version of this patch series that aims to give >> a >> framework for documenting upcoming breaking changes in Git. >> Changes compared to v5: >> - Note that Git 1.6 was a breaking release, despite the fact that >> its >> major version wasn't bumped. >> - Several smallish rewordings. >> - Note that items on the lists should only be discussed anew when >> circumstances have changed. >> - Add some conditions to the move to "sha256". Also, note that we >> do >> not plan to deprecate "sha1". >> - Note that replacement refs are also superior over grafts >> because >> they can be carried across repos. > > This version looks good to me > > Thanks for writing this document Yup, aside from two typos and a misstatement I did not spot anything that need correction. Will queue. Thanks.