From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>
Cc: Git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>,
Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] builtin/remote.c: teach `-v` to list filters for promisor remotes
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:37:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk0ap9t4f.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20220513134946.1581-1-chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com
Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com> writes:
> Else you can drop the idea and suggest them to introduce a new flag
> (depending on the situation). If you still have some doubt about my
> PR i.e. if you can not determine which category my PR belongs to, I
> can go with adding `show-partial-clone` flag. The downside would
> be that `remote -v` will not give the full summary in case of partial
> clone.
If majority of partial-clone users find it unnecessary noise, then
it may be an upside to give only reduced summary that is less than
full that may be given by `remote -v -v`.
Worse downside of adding it as an option is that it invites more
options. It is less worse to add new ones to `remote -v -v` (or to
`remote -v`, or not adding it at all) than adding another option, I
would think.
Perhaps tagged output that can be easier to parse would be better
"extensible" output format for adding more random pieces of
information than going tabular. I dunno.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-30 13:19 [PATCH] builtin/remote.c: teach `-v` to list filters for promisor remotes Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget
2022-04-30 21:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-01 15:57 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-01 16:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-01 19:38 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-02 10:33 ` Philip Oakley
2022-05-02 14:56 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-03 15:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget
2022-05-04 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-05 14:12 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-07 14:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget
2022-05-08 15:33 ` Philippe Blain
2022-05-09 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-09 16:45 ` Philippe Blain
2022-05-08 15:44 ` Philippe Blain
2022-05-09 9:13 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-09 11:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Abhradeep Chakraborty via GitGitGadget
2022-05-09 15:34 ` Taylor Blau
2022-05-09 17:01 ` Philippe Blain
2022-05-09 17:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-05-13 13:49 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-13 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-05-16 15:38 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-09 17:21 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-05-09 22:22 ` Taylor Blau
2022-05-09 17:44 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqk0ap9t4f.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.email \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).