From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBE6C433B4 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2D261403 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234240AbhDTWpF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:45:05 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:59021 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233964AbhDTWpE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:45:04 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4EB12DB39; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:44:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7WWWdFfDWDEJRl96InqSMEYHZ6w=; b=WALuhl KEEXmO0nqcT0Pq5H5TYJUAN5l+uJu4f8KXHnwQD/Bsehj6uS8Se4/P70JwUq/P+d jqfzeqb5Sm2iGgtuMXHbRSJLuYi5Llb6Tm+dR4Tt/e1BQFYyQHyXwcB8npuAtNr5 L0pMi8GoKxd6D3AHXSEZARNpid4Gukh/oUfXc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KMEKSa/HeYR7TOBJzq9nMwOirDUg1iL8 lAC7Dv/EbyonMRuX/WLJqXu5P8UudbWvUaSJ8hSILgq2upJyVDTjqKbwXcgF0tYb Am2ApVfOt+Q8nL4jsqLOuDQLB9HuS7a4De01uZKGdmc1EnLIMYsuMnXVKnZs+aNv Mh4KPdKio80= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E8912DB38; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:44:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A02412DB37; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:44:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys , Jeff King , Ramsay Jones , Jonathan Nieder , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Tan , Josh Steadmon , Emily Shaffer , Patrick Steinhardt , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Felipe Contreras , Derrick Stolee , Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 23/28] Reftable support for git-core References: <2fd7cb8c0983501e2af2f195aec81d7c17fb80e1.1618832277.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:44:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <2fd7cb8c0983501e2af2f195aec81d7c17fb80e1.1618832277.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:37:51 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F773EE38-A229-11EB-85CB-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget" writes: > +if test -n "$GIT_TEST_REFTABLE" > +then > + test_set_prereq REFTABLE > +fi How would this interact with what the test prep series did which was to unconditionally add test_seq_prereq REFFILES around the same place? Should $GIT_TEST_REFTABLE disable REFFILES? IOW, do you want the above to read if test -n "$GIT_TEST_REFTABLE" then test_set_prereq REFTABLE else test_set_prereq REFFILES fi when both series are in effect? Thanks.