From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A53C11D3D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C54C2469B for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="eraXhC0c" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729773AbgB0RyN (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:54:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57539 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729433AbgB0RyN (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:54:13 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E334036C; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:54:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=bNbr6z5Z0m4eGtQ+edh1lKJjyjs=; b=eraXhC 0cn7Y14Kzwrkq+8NGkRUEr0D1Og6Qb4Uyqi7oVqjP1k2vEDwk4p4LITDW21hzbPn 4ZuiSJVZnP+PVI0sPgVSg/7lIEK08sGoyqmUAJuKq9EZ338nXBRmLcZ2I60qt5wv gHXtBUQPgIdftL65VfH8C2D3Ussj+41bdrRQ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dqvO1ThF+WKuZXYO9E3Gn6tLKUUf2m+s WY8au+LR+V0BzVf7JaKzRt1MWB00tlbk+0ahtTf4ATwpKuFkVhNjkMNd1zWmnrHn z96fr2Q5St2DTqQrmjzXIYmTGsrEw3hTEE0Z3846WOLmWy/3c2pRntE8EAMVLQcS XuOqn+LmWpI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E4E40369; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:54:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD79540368; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:54:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Pascal Roeleven Cc: Danh Doan , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ls-remote: don't use '-h' for options References: <20200227130833.GA10339@danh.dev> <03985e4099e82f04709d5ea9ca2a56a6@pascalroeleven.nl> <74969200f4dd2993eece8308a72546c3@pascalroeleven.nl> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:54:09 -0800 In-Reply-To: <74969200f4dd2993eece8308a72546c3@pascalroeleven.nl> (Pascal Roeleven's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:39:44 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 28744D8C-598A-11EA-B656-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Pascal Roeleven writes: > Although I still don't quite agree with the inner workings of this > command (but I understand the choice because of > backwards-compatibility),... Yeah, the unpleasant backstory is that "ls-remote -h" predates the universal "-h" support offered by the parse-options API by a large margin.