From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Kai Koponen <kaikoponen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bloom: use bloom filter given multiple pathspec
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:15:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqldper3lt.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <691CA448-881F-45BF-9D38-190F189DBB4E@smail.nju.edu.cn> (Lidong Yan's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:34:38 +0800")
Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn> writes:
> I assume that t4216/test_bloom_filters_used has already verified that
> using bloom filters with multiple pathspec elements produces the same
> results as when bloom filters are not used. But I would love to add more
> test cases to check no false negative happened.
If we are sure we have enough test coverage, then it is great. If
not, it is superb if you can add some test coverage there.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 12:55 [PATCH 0/2] bloom: use bloom filter given multiple pathspec Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 17:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-26 3:44 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 12:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] bloom: enable multiple pathspec bloom keys Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 13:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-27 14:24 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-01 5:52 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-01 15:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-02 7:14 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-02 15:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-03 1:52 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 12:09 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-01 8:50 ` SZEDER Gábor
2025-07-01 11:40 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-01 15:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-27 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-28 2:54 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-25 17:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] bloom: use bloom filter given multiple pathspec Junio C Hamano
2025-06-26 3:34 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-26 14:15 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-06-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-06-28 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 " Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] bloom: add test helper to return murmur3 hash Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] bloom: rename function operates on bloom_key Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-07 11:35 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-07 14:14 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-04 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-07-07 11:43 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-07 14:18 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-07 15:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements " Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] bloom: add test helper to return murmur3 hash Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] bloom: rename function operates on bloom_key Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 16:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 12:46 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-11 15:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-10 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 13:51 ` [PATCH v5.1 3.5/4] revision: make helper for pathspec to bloom key Derrick Stolee
2025-07-10 15:42 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 13:55 ` [PATCH v5.1 4/4] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision Derrick Stolee
2025-07-10 15:49 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-10 13:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements in revision traversal Derrick Stolee
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] " Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] bloom: add test helper to return murmur3 hash Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] bloom: rename function operates on bloom_key Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] revision: make helper for pathspec to bloom keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:35 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] To enable optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal, return 0 if all pathspec item is literal in forbid_bloom_filters(). Add for loops to initialize and check each pathspec item's bloom_keyvec when optimization is possible Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:47 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-12 9:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision Lidong Yan
2025-07-14 16:51 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-14 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-15 1:37 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-15 2:56 ` [RESEND][PATCH " Lidong Yan
2025-07-14 16:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] bloom: enable bloom filter optimization for multiple pathspec elements in revision traversal Derrick Stolee
2025-07-14 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-15 1:34 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-15 2:48 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-07-15 15:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-28 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-07-02 15:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-07-02 15:49 ` Lidong Yan
2025-07-02 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-03 1:41 ` Lidong Yan
2025-06-28 4:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] bloom: replace struct bloom_key * with struct bloom_keyvec Lidong Yan
2025-06-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal Lidong Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqldper3lt.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kaikoponen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).